Which one of the following statements best reflects the most rational, practical and immediate action required to ensure fair and equitable allocation of water to different stakeholders?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A national, pragmatic, legal and policy framework for water allocation should be made.
The passage says fair sharing needs a basin-based approach and shares fixed on objective criteria, which means agreed rules for allocation. A national legal and policy framework is the only option that supplies such rules; the others are engineering or demand-side ideas the passage never proposes.
- ✓ (a) The passage's key is 'a basin-based approach' with shares assessed on 'objective criteria'. A national legal and policy framework is the practical way to apply such rules across States, especially as water is a State subject.
- ✗ (b) Linking every river and creating huge aquifers is a vast engineering project, neither immediate nor mentioned; the passage is about sharing existing water fairly.
- ✗ (c) Channels from surplus to deficit regions move water, but they do not settle who gets how much; the passage never suggests them.
- ✗ (d) Cutting demand may ease stress, but the question asks how to allocate water fairly among stakeholders, which demand cuts do not decide.
Remember · For 'most rational, practical, immediate action', pick the option that puts the passage's own solution into practice; reject grand projects it never mentions.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·