Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.To implement the Sustainable Development Goals and to achieve zero-hunger goal, monoculture agriculture practices are inevitable even if they do not address malnutrition.
- 2.Dependence on a few crops has negative consequences for human health and the ecosystem.
- 3.Government policies regarding food planning need to incorporate nutritional security.
- 4.For the present monoculture agriculture practices, farmers receive subsidies in various ways and government offers remunerative prices for grains and therefore they do not tend to consider crop diversity.
Which of the above assumptions are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 2 and 3 only
The passage blames the long focus on staples and intensive monoculture for the decline of nutritious crops and for degrading land, water and food, even as grain output rose without ending malnutrition. It therefore assumes that dependence on a few crops harms health and ecosystems, and that food planning must include nutrition.
- ✗ 1. The passage criticises monoculture for perpetuating the nutrition problem; it never calls it inevitable for the SDGs or zero hunger.
- ✓ 2. The focus on staples pushed out nutritious crops (health), and monoculture degrades 'land, water and food' (ecosystem).
- ✓ 3. Grain output rose over five times yet malnutrition persists, so food planning must aim at nutrition, not quantity alone.
- ✗ 4. Subsidies and remunerative prices are not mentioned; this explanation is brought in from outside the passage.
Remember · Valid assumptions follow from the passage's own reasoning; reject facts brought in from outside, even if true in real life.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·