According to the passage, which of the following factor/factors led to the adverse consequences for governance/public administration?
- 1.Inability of civil services to strike a balance between internal and external accountabilities
- 2.Lack of sufficient professional training to the officers of All India Services
- 3.Lack of proper service benefits in civil services
- 4.Lack of Constitutional provisions to define the respective roles of professional civil services vis-a-vis political executive in this context
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) 1 and 4 only
The passage blames the tilt towards internal accountability to political leaders, a balance that was never properly struck, for the adverse consequences, and it asks that the respective roles of civil services and the political executive be defined. Training and service benefits are never mentioned.
- ✓ 1. The emphasis 'tilted in favour of greater internal accountability', and this system 'has not worked out, and has led to several adverse consequences' — the balance was not struck.
- ✗ 2. Professional training of officers is not discussed anywhere in the passage.
- ✗ 3. Service benefits are not discussed; the job security under Articles 311 and 312 is never called inadequate.
- ✓ 4. 'The issue is where to draw the line': the passage wants Articles 311 and 312 reviewed and the 'respective roles' of civil services and the political executive 'defined' — they are not defined now.
Remember · Accept only causes the passage ties to the problem; a remedy it proposes ('roles should be defined') points to a gap behind the problem.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2016, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·