With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Human relationships are derived from their religious traditions
- 2.Human beings can be duty bound only if they believe in god
- 3.Religious traditions are essential to practice and understand justice
Which of these assumption(s) is/are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) 1 only
The passage says our duties to one another derive from religious traditions' stress on duty to god or a universal principle, so assumption 1 holds. It allows 'some universal ethical principle' in place of god, and it calls community solidarity — not religion — essential to justice, so 2 and 3 fail.
- ✓ 1. 'Our duties to one another derive from these', and the concept of rights shapes 'our other relationships' — relationships flow from religious traditions.
- ✗ 2. 'Only if they believe in god' is too extreme; the duty may be to 'some universal ethical principle'.
- ✗ 3. What is 'essential to the practice and understanding of justice' is solidarity in a community, not religious tradition.
Remember · Watch the qualifiers — 'only', 'essential', 'always'. An assumption carrying one must be backed by the passage's own words.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2016, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·