Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical and rational implication conveyed by the passage?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Knee-jerk reactions cannot solve the problem of pollution but an evidence-based approach will be more effective.
The author finds drastic, arbitrary measures (odd-even, bans on old vehicles and certain fuels) ineffective and unfair, and closes by asking for scientific, reliable information on pollution sources and on technologies that work. In short: evidence, not knee-jerk action.
- ✗ (a) The passage calls arbitrary bans ineffective, 'not proper' and 'unfair', not difficult to implement.
- ✓ (b) Drastic actions leave 'the air ... not clean', and the author ends with 'What is needed is the scientific and reliable information' — an evidence-based approach.
- ✗ (c) No penalty is proposed; the passage defends vehicles that have passed fitness and pollution tests.
- ✗ (d) The passage never says pollution laws are absent or that this causes arbitrary decisions.
Remember · Read the closing 'what is needed' sentence; the implication usually restates it. Reject options about ease, penalties or laws never discussed.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·