Minimalist IAS
CSAT

CSAT · 299 questions

Reading comprehension

Every UPSC CSAT question on this topic, 2016–2026, newest first. Tap an option to check yourself; the answer and explanation open below it.

Reading comprehension questions per year: 2016: 27, 2017: 31, 2018: 26, 2019: 30, 2020: 25, 2021: 27, 2022: 27, 2023: 27, 2024: 27, 2025: 29, 2026: 23 Asked in 11 of 11 years · most in 2017 (31)

UPSC syllabus: “Comprehension;” See the full syllabus →

Showing 91–120 of 299, newest first.

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

There is a claim that organic farming is inherently safer and healthier. The reality is that because the organic farming industry is still young and not well-regulated in India, farmers and consumers, alike, are not only confused about what products are best for them, but sometimes use products in ways that could harm them as well. For example, since organic fertilizers are difficult to obtain on a large scale in India, farmers often use farmyard manure, which may contain toxic chemicals and heavy metals. Certain plant sprays, such as Datura flower and leaf spray, have an element called atropine. If it is not applied in the right dose, it can act on the nervous system of the consumer. Unfortunately, how much and when to use it are not well-researched or regulated issues.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Organic farming is inherently unsafe for both farmers and consumers.
  2. 2.Farmers and consumers need to be educated about eco-friendly food.

Which of the assumptions given above is/are correct?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) 2 only

The author disputes the claim that organic farming is inherently safer, but traces the dangers to a young, poorly regulated industry and to confusion and misuse by farmers and consumers. So the passage assumes they need to be better informed, not that organic farming is unsafe by nature.

  • ✗ 1. The risks come from poor regulation, substitutes such as contaminated manure and wrong doses of sprays, not from organic farming itself; 'inherently unsafe' goes too far.
  • ✓ 2. Farmers and consumers are 'confused about what products are best for them' and use products in harmful ways, which presumes that educating them would help.

Remember · Rejecting 'inherently safe' does not mean 'inherently unsafe'; watch for options that flip a claim to its extreme opposite.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

There is a claim that organic farming is inherently safer and healthier. The reality is that because the organic farming industry is still young and not well-regulated in India, farmers and consumers, alike, are not only confused about what products are best for them, but sometimes use products in ways that could harm them as well. For example, since organic fertilizers are difficult to obtain on a large scale in India, farmers often use farmyard manure, which may contain toxic chemicals and heavy metals. Certain plant sprays, such as Datura flower and leaf spray, have an element called atropine. If it is not applied in the right dose, it can act on the nervous system of the consumer. Unfortunately, how much and when to use it are not well-researched or regulated issues.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and practical message conveyed by the author of the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) In India, farmers need to be guided and helped to make their organic farming sustainable.

Farmers misuse inputs such as farmyard manure and Datura spray because the sector is young, poorly regulated and under-researched. The practical message is that farmers need guidance and support to make organic farming safe and sustainable.

  • ✗ (a) The passage does not compare organic with conventional farming or argue against promoting organic farming.
  • ✗ (b) 'No safe organic alternatives' is too extreme; the problem is misuse and weak regulation, not the absence of safe options.
  • ✓ (c) Confusion, harmful use and unresearched doses all point to the need to guide and help farmers.
  • ✗ (d) Profits and global markets are outside the passage.

Remember · For a 'practical message', choose the constructive remedy that answers the problems described; reject blanket negatives and outside topics.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—3) — this item is based on it

Food consumption patterns have changed substantially in India over the past few decades. This has resulted in the disappearance of many nutritious foods such as millets. While food grain production has increased over five times since independence, it has not sufficiently addressed the issue of malnutrition. For long, the agriculture sector focussed on increasing food production particularly staples, which led to lower production and consumption of indigenous traditional crops/grains, fruits and other vegetables, impacting food and nutrition security in the process. Further, intensive, monoculture agriculture practices can perpetuate the food and nutrition security problem by degrading the quality of land, water and food derived through them.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.To implement the Sustainable Development Goals and to achieve zero-hunger goal, monoculture agriculture practices are inevitable even if they do not address malnutrition.
  2. 2.Dependence on a few crops has negative consequences for human health and the ecosystem.
  3. 3.Government policies regarding food planning need to incorporate nutritional security.
  4. 4.For the present monoculture agriculture practices, farmers receive subsidies in various ways and government offers remunerative prices for grains and therefore they do not tend to consider crop diversity.

Which of the above assumptions are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) 2 and 3 only

The passage blames the long focus on staples and intensive monoculture for the decline of nutritious crops and for degrading land, water and food, even as grain output rose without ending malnutrition. It therefore assumes that dependence on a few crops harms health and ecosystems, and that food planning must include nutrition.

  • ✗ 1. The passage criticises monoculture for perpetuating the nutrition problem; it never calls it inevitable for the SDGs or zero hunger.
  • ✓ 2. The focus on staples pushed out nutritious crops (health), and monoculture degrades 'land, water and food' (ecosystem).
  • ✓ 3. Grain output rose over five times yet malnutrition persists, so food planning must aim at nutrition, not quantity alone.
  • ✗ 4. Subsidies and remunerative prices are not mentioned; this explanation is brought in from outside the passage.

Remember · Valid assumptions follow from the passage's own reasoning; reject facts brought in from outside, even if true in real life.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

Scientists studied the vernal window — transition period from winter to the growing season. They found that warmer winters with less snow resulted in a longer lag time between spring events and a more protracted vernal window. This change in the spring timetable has ecological, social and economic consequences — for agriculture, fisheries and tourism. As the ice melts earlier, the birds don't return, causing a delay, or lengthening in springtime ecological events.

With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Global warming is causing spring to come early and for longer durations.
  2. 2.Early spring and longer period of spring is not good for bird populations.

Which of the above assumptions is/are correct?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) 1 only

The passage links warmer winters with less snow to earlier ice-melt and a longer, more drawn-out vernal window, which takes a warming climate to be making spring come early and last longer. It reports that birds do not return on time, but says nothing about harm to bird populations.

  • ✓ 1. 'Warmer winters with less snow' produce 'a more protracted vernal window' and ice that 'melts earlier': the passage takes it that warming brings spring earlier and stretches it out.
  • ✗ 2. The passage says the birds don't return, delaying springtime events; it says nothing about bird numbers, so harm to bird populations is not assumed.

Remember · Separate what a passage reports (birds' timing changes) from a further judgement it never makes (populations suffer).

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

A global analysis of nitrogen use efficiency — a measure of the amount of nitrogen a plant takes in to grow versus what is left behind as pollution — says that using too much fertilizers will lead to increased pollution of waterways and the air. Currently, the global average for nitrogen use efficiency is approximately 0.4, meaning 40 per cent of the total nitrogen added to cropland goes into the harvested crop while 60 per cent is lost to the environment, says a study. More than half of the world's population is nourished by food grown with fertilizers containing synthetic nitrogen, which is needed to produce high crop yields. Plants take the nitrogen they need to grow, and the excess is left in the ground, water and air. This results in significant emissions of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse and ozone depleting gas, and other forms of nitrogen pollution, including eutrophication of lakes and rivers and contamination of river water.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and crucial message implied by the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) An enhanced efficiency of use of nitrogen is imperative for both food production and environment.

Synthetic nitrogen feeds more than half the world, yet 60 per cent of the nitrogen applied is lost as pollution. The balanced message is to use nitrogen more efficiently, keeping yields up while cutting pollution.

  • ✓ (a) The passage is built around 'nitrogen use efficiency': synthetic nitrogen is 'needed to produce high crop yields', but low efficiency (0·4) pollutes air and water. Higher efficiency serves both food and environment.
  • ✗ (b) Stopping fertilizer production is never discussed; the option defends a point the passage does not raise.
  • ✗ (c) Replacing crops is not suggested; the problem is excess application, not the crops themselves.
  • ✗ (d) Replacing conventional agriculture is too drastic when the passage says synthetic nitrogen nourishes over half the world.

Remember · When a passage shows both a need and a harm, the crucial message usually balances them rather than dropping either.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—3) — this item is based on it

Along with sustainable lifestyles, climate justice is regarded as a significant principle in environmental parlance. Both the principles have bearings on political and economic choices of the nation. So far, in our climate change summits or compacts, both the principles have eluded consensus among nations. Justice, in the judicial sense, is well defined. However, in the context of climate change, it has scientific as well as socio-political connotations. The crucial question in the next few years will be how resources, technologies and regulations are used to support the victims of climate change. Justice in climate is not confined to actions relating to mitigation, but includes the wider notion of support for adaptation to climate change and compensation for loss and damage.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and crucial message conveyed by the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) Climate justice should be ingrained in detail in the rules of all the new climate compacts/agreements.

Climate justice has so far eluded consensus at climate summits, and the crucial question ahead is how resources, technologies and regulations will support victims through mitigation, adaptation and compensation for loss and damage. The message is that climate justice must be built into the rules of future climate agreements.

  • ✓ (a) The principle has 'eluded consensus' in 'summits or compacts', and the passage lists what justice must include (mitigation, adaptation support, compensation). Writing it into new agreements follows.
  • ✗ (b) Uneven distribution of environmental resources is not discussed.
  • ✗ (c) The passage speaks of supporting victims, but not of an impending problem of huge numbers of climate refugees.
  • ✗ (d) Blame on developed countries and burden-sharing are outside the passage.

Remember · When a passage names an unresolved principle and spells out what it must cover, the message is usually to build it into future rules.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

Sourcing food from non-agricultural lands (uncultivated systems such as forests, wetlands, pastures, etc) in addition to agricultural lands enables a systemic approach to food consumption. It allows rural and tribal communities to sustain themselves for the whole year and steer clear of natural disasters and season-induced shortfalls of agricultural food. Since the productivity of trees is often more resilient to adverse weather conditions than annual crops, forest foods often provide a safety net during periods of food shortages caused by crop failure; forest foods also make important contributions during seasonal crop production gaps.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical and rational message conveyed by the author of the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) Agroecosystems should be developed in addition to or along with conventional agriculture.

The passage recommends sourcing food from forests, wetlands and pastures in addition to farmland, because such foods are resilient and fill gaps when crops fail or between seasons. So these food systems should be developed alongside conventional agriculture, not in place of it.

  • ✗ (a) Replacing other trees with food-yielding trees is not proposed.
  • ✗ (b) 'Cannot be ensured' is too strong; the passage offers a supplement to agriculture, not a verdict against it.
  • ✗ (c) Converting wastelands is not discussed; the passage speaks of existing uncultivated systems such as forests and wetlands.
  • ✓ (d) The key phrase is 'in addition to agricultural lands': uncultivated food systems act as a safety net alongside conventional farming.

Remember · Watch small phrases like 'in addition to': they rule out options that replace rather than supplement.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

While awareness on use/misuse and abuse of antibiotics is common knowledge, as is the impact of dosing poultry with antibiotics, the environmental impact of antibiotics-manufacturing companies not treating their waste has scarcely been discussed at any length or seriousness thus far. Pollution from antibiotics factories is fuelling the rise of drug-resistant infections. The occurrence of drug-resistant bacteria surrounding the pharma manufacturing plants is well known.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical and practical message conveyed by the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) It is necessary to put proper effluent treatment protocols in place.

The passage's new point is that antibiotic factories that do not treat their waste are fuelling drug-resistant infections around their plants. The practical remedy is proper treatment of their effluents.

  • ✓ (a) The problem named is 'companies not treating their waste'; effluent treatment protocols tackle it directly.
  • ✗ (b) Awareness of antibiotic misuse is already 'common knowledge'; the neglected issue is factory waste, not public awareness.
  • ✗ (c) The passage ties resistance to untreated factory pollution, which can be fixed; it does not call the spread inherent or unavoidable.
  • ✗ (d) Moving factories to remote areas would shift the pollution, not treat it.

Remember · For a 'practical message', choose the remedy that targets the exact cause named; relocation or awareness drives miss it.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—3) — this item is based on it

Benefits of good quality school education accrue only when students complete and leave school after having acquired the gateway skills. Like one learns to walk before running, similarly one picks up advanced skills only after picking the basic foundational skills. The advent of the knowledge economy poses new challenges, and one of the severe consequences of having an uneducated workforce will be our inability to keep pace with the global economy. Without a strong learning foundation at the primary level, there can be no improvement in higher education or skill development.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the crux of the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) To become a global power, India needs to invest in universal quality education.

Advanced skills rest on foundational learning; without a strong primary base there can be no improvement in higher education or skills, and an uneducated workforce cannot keep pace with the global economy. The crux is that India must invest in quality education for all to compete globally.

  • ✓ (a) Quality schooling that gives every student the 'gateway skills' is presented as the base for keeping pace with the global, knowledge-based economy.
  • ✗ (b) The passage does not say India is unable to become a global power or that it neglects the knowledge economy.
  • ✗ (c) It says the opposite: improvement in higher education and skills depends on a strong primary foundation.
  • ✗ (d) Parents' literacy is not mentioned.

Remember · The crux keeps the passage's own order of priorities; an option that reverses it (higher education before foundations) is wrong.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

The paradox of choice is illustrated by the story of Buridan's ass. Jean Buridan, the 14th century philosopher, wrote about free will and the inability to choose due to numerous choices and uncertainties. In the story, a donkey stands between two equally appealing stacks of hay. Unable to decide which to eat, it starves to death. Changes in technology and innovations such as smart phones and tablets only exacerbate our glut of choices. Constant connectivity and overconsumption of real-time data and social media can leave little room for self-reflection and rest, making decisions more difficult. Life is about choices. Many people are overwhelmed with attractive life choices, yet find themselves unhappy and anxious.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical message implied by the above passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) In our lives, having too few choices may not be a good thing, but having too many can be equally as difficult.

Buridan's ass starves between two equally good choices, and modern technology only adds to our glut of choices, leaving people overwhelmed, unhappy and anxious. The implied message is the paradox of choice: too many choices can be as troublesome as too few.

  • ✗ (a) Technology is said to worsen our glut of choices, not to weaken the structure of society.
  • ✗ (b) The passage is about the burden of too many attractive choices, not a life of endless uncertainty and difficulty in general.
  • ✗ (c) Other people's opinions and lack of courage are not discussed.
  • ✓ (d) People 'overwhelmed with attractive life choices, yet ... unhappy and anxious' show that an excess of choice brings its own difficulty — the paradox of choice.

Remember · When a passage opens with a named idea (here, the paradox of choice), the right option usually restates that idea.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

Household finance in India is unique. We have a tendency to invest heavily in physical assets such as gold and property. Steps to encourage the financialization of savings are critical. A populace accustomed to traditional processes will not simply jump into financialization. Hurdles to change include onerous bureaucracy, a scepticism of organized financial institutions, a lack of basic information about which of the myriad services and providers is best for each family, and how (and even if) one can make the transition between them if necessary.

Regarding the financialization of household savings, which of the following statements best reflect the solutions that are implied by the passage?

  1. 1.A flexible environment is needed to develop solutions.
  2. 2.Households need customised solutions.
  3. 3.Innovations in financial technology are required.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) 1, 2 and 3

The passage lists the hurdles to financialization: onerous bureaucracy, scepticism of formal institutions, lack of information about which of many services suits each family, and difficulty in switching between them. Each suggested solution answers one of these hurdles, so all three are implied.

  • ✓ 1. 'Onerous bureaucracy' is a named hurdle; a flexible, less rigid environment is the implied answer.
  • ✓ 2. People lack information on which service 'is best for each family', so solutions must be suited to each household.
  • ✓ 3. Financial technology can give easy information, simpler access and smoother switching between providers — the remaining hurdles.

Remember · For implied solutions, match each hurdle the passage lists to a remedy; a remedy that answers a named hurdle is implied.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—3) — this item is based on it

Pharmaceutical patents grant protection to the patentee for the duration of the patent term. The patentees enjoy the liberty to determine the prices of medicines, which is time-limited to the period of monopoly, but could be unaffordable to the public. Such patent protection offered to the patentees is believed to benefit the public over the longer term through innovations and research and development (R&D), although it comes at a cost, in the nature of higher prices for the patented medicine. The patent regime and price protection — through a legally validated high price for the medicine during the currency of the patent — provide the patentee with a legitimate mechanism to get returns on the costs incurred in innovation and research.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Patent protection given to patentees puts a huge burden on public's purchasing power in accessing patented medicines.
  2. 2.Dependence on other countries for pharmaceutical products is a huge burden for developing and poor countries.
  3. 3.Providing medicines to the public at affordable prices is a key goal during the public health policy design in many countries.
  4. 4.Governments need to find an appropriate balance between the rights of patentees and the requirements of the patients.

Which of the above assumptions are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) 1 and 4

Patents let firms set high prices that may be unaffordable, justified as a return on innovation that benefits the public later. This assumes a real burden on buyers of patented medicines and a need for governments to balance patentees' rights with patients' needs.

  • ✓ 1. Prices during the monopoly 'could be unaffordable to the public' and the benefit 'comes at a cost ... of higher prices' — a burden on buyers.
  • ✗ 2. Dependence on other countries for medicines is not discussed.
  • ✗ 3. How countries design public health policy is outside the passage, which only describes the patent trade-off.
  • ✓ 4. The patentee's 'legitimate mechanism to get returns' stands against prices the public may not afford; resolving this tension calls for a balance.

Remember · Assumptions come from tensions inside the passage; reject statements about topics (imports, policy design) it never touches.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—4) — this item is based on it

India should ensure the growth of the digital economy while keeping personal data of citizens secure and protected. No one will innovate in a surveillance-oriented environment or in a place where an individual's personal information is compromised. The ultimate control of data must reside with the individuals who generate it; they should be enabled to use, restrict or monetise it as they wish. Therefore, data protection laws should enable the right kind of innovation — one that is user-centric and privacy protecting.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Protection of privacy is not just a right, but it has value to the economy.
  2. 2.There is a fundamental link between privacy and innovation.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Both 1 and 2

The passage ties the protection of personal data to growth of the digital economy and says no one will innovate where personal information is compromised. So privacy has economic value and is closely linked to innovation; both assumptions hold.

  • ✓ 1. India should grow the digital economy 'while keeping personal data ... secure', and individuals may 'monetise' their data — privacy carries economic value.
  • ✓ 2. 'No one will innovate in a surveillance-oriented environment', and laws should enable 'privacy protecting' innovation — a direct link.

Remember · If the argument rests on a chain of links (privacy → innovation → digital economy), each link is a valid assumption.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

In India, while the unemployment rate is a frequently used measure of poor performance of the economy, under conditions of rising school and college enrolment, it paints an inaccurate picture. The reported unemployment rate is dominated by the experience of younger Indians who face higher employment challenges and exhibit greater willingness to wait for the right job than their older peers. The unemployment challenge is greater for people with secondary or higher education, and rising education levels inflate unemployment challenges.

Which one of the following statements most likely reflects as to what the author of the passage intends to say?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) Unemployment must be seen as a function of rising education and aspirations of young Indians.

The author says the unemployment rate misleads when enrolment is rising: educated young Indians wait for the right job, and rising education levels inflate unemployment. So unemployment has to be read against rising education and aspirations, not only as a sign of a weak economy.

  • ✗ (a) The passage says nothing about the quality of education; it only notes rising enrolment.
  • ✓ (b) The rate 'paints an inaccurate picture' because the young 'wait for the right job' and 'rising education levels inflate unemployment challenges' — unemployment tracks education and aspirations.
  • ✗ (c) Labour-intensive industries are not mentioned; this brings in an outside cause.
  • ✗ (d) The passage diagnoses how to read the unemployment rate; it offers no remedy such as redesigning education for self-employment.

Remember · For 'what the author intends to say', pick the option that restates the central claim; reject causes or remedies the passage never mentions.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

“Science by itself is not enough, there must be a force and discipline outside the sciences to coordinate them and point to a goal. It is not possible to run a course aright when the goal itself has not been rightly placed. What science needs is philosophy — the analysis of scientific method and the coordination of scientific purposes and results; without this, any science must be superficial. Government suffers, precisely like science, for lack of philosophy. Philosophy bears to science the same relationship which statesmanship bears to politics: movement guided by total knowledge and perspective, as against aimless and individual seeking. Just as the pursuit of knowledge becomes scholasticism when divorced from the actual needs of men and life, so the pursuit of politics becomes a destructive bedlam when divorced from science and philosophy.”

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most rational, logical and practical message conveyed by the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) It is not desirable to have Governments managed by empirical statesmen unless well mixed with others who are grounded in learning and reflect wisdom.

The passage says government, like science, suffers for lack of philosophy, and that politics divorced from science and philosophy becomes a 'destructive bedlam'. The practical lesson is that government should not be left to merely empirical statesmen; they must work alongside people grounded in learning and wisdom.

  • ✗ (a) Tempting, but the passage does not ask every statesman to be trained in scientific method; it asks that politics be guided by knowledge and perspective — a narrower, less practical prescription.
  • ✓ (b) 'Government suffers ... for lack of philosophy' and politics becomes 'bedlam when divorced from science and philosophy' — so rule by the merely empirical needs the balance of the learned and wise.
  • ✗ (c) An education system training all citizens from an early age goes far beyond anything the passage discusses.
  • ✗ (d) 'All scientists' must be philosophers is extreme; the passage wants philosophy as a coordinating discipline 'outside the sciences', and its real concern is government.

Remember · When asked for the 'most practical' message, prefer the moderate, workable conclusion; drop options that demand training for everyone or use 'all'.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—3) — this item is based on it

“The last end of the state is not to dominate men, nor to restrain them by fear; rather it is so to free each man from fear that he may live and act with full security and without injury to himself or his neighbour. The end of the state, I repeat, is not to make rational beings into brute beasts and machines. It is to enable their bodies and their minds to function safely. It is to lead men to live by, and to exercise, a free reason; that they may not waste their strength in hatred, anger and guile, nor act unfairly toward one another.”

Based on the above passage, which one of the following terms best expresses the ultimate goal of the state?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) Liberty

The passage says the end of the state is to free each man from fear, to let bodies and minds function safely, and to lead men to exercise a free reason. Every one of these aims is a form of freedom, so liberty is the term that covers them all.

  • ✗ (a) Security 'without injury' is part of the aim, but it serves the larger end of freeing each man from fear — too narrow.
  • ✗ (b) Bodies and minds functioning 'safely' is a means; the passage never names health as the end.
  • ✗ (c) Not acting 'unfairly toward one another' is a result of free reason, not the ultimate goal.
  • ✓ (d) 'To free each man from fear', to 'live by, and to exercise, a free reason' — the state's end is liberty.

Remember · For 'ultimate goal' questions, choose the single term that covers every aim the passage lists; partial aims are traps.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

The main threat to maintaining progress in human development comes from the increasingly evident unsustainability of production and consumption patterns. Current production models rely heavily on fossil fuels. We now know that this is unsustainable because the resources are finite. The close link between economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions needs to be severed for human development to become truly sustainable. Some developed countries have begun to alleviate the worst effects by expanding recycling and investing in public transport and infrastructure. But most developing countries are hampered by the high costs and low availability of clean energy sources. Developed countries need to support developing countries’ transition to sustainable human development.

Unsustainability in production pattern is due to which of the following?

  1. 1.Heavy dependence on fossil fuels
  2. 2.Limited availability of resources
  3. 3.Expansion of recycling

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only

The passage says current production models rely heavily on fossil fuels and that this is unsustainable because the resources are finite. Recycling appears only as a remedy some developed countries are using, never as a cause.

  • ✓ 1. “Current production models rely heavily on fossil fuels. We now know that this is unsustainable…” — heavy dependence on fossil fuels is named as the problem.
  • ✓ 2. The reason given is “because the resources are finite” — that is, resources are available only in limited amounts.
  • ✗ 3. Expanding recycling is how some developed countries “alleviate the worst effects”. It eases the problem; it does not cause it.

Remember · Separate cause from remedy: whatever a passage lists as a fix for a problem cannot also be its cause.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

The main threat to maintaining progress in human development comes from the increasingly evident unsustainability of production and consumption patterns. Current production models rely heavily on fossil fuels. We now know that this is unsustainable because the resources are finite. The close link between economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions needs to be severed for human development to become truly sustainable. Some developed countries have begun to alleviate the worst effects by expanding recycling and investing in public transport and infrastructure. But most developing countries are hampered by the high costs and low availability of clean energy sources. Developed countries need to support developing countries’ transition to sustainable human development.

Consider the following statements:

Developed countries can support developing countries’ transition to sustainable human development by

  1. 1.making clean energy sources available at low cost
  2. 2.providing loans for improving their public transport at nominal interest rates
  3. 3.encouraging them to change their production and consumption patterns

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) 1 and 2 only

The passage names what holds developing countries back — “the high costs and low availability of clean energy sources” — and cites public transport and infrastructure as steps that ease the damage. Real support therefore means removing these material barriers; merely encouraging a change of habits does not.

  • ✓ 1. It answers the exact hurdle the passage names: developing countries are “hampered by the high costs and low availability of clean energy sources”.
  • ✓ 2. The passage cites “investing in public transport and infrastructure” as a way to alleviate the worst effects; cheap loans let developing countries, held back by cost, do the same.
  • ✗ 3. The passage does not say developing countries lack the will to change — it says they are hampered by cost and availability. Encouragement does not touch that barrier, so it is not the support the passage calls for.

Remember · In ‘how can X help Y’ items, match the help to the obstacle the passage names; exhortation is rarely the support meant.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

Unless the forces and tendencies which are responsible for destroying the country’s environment are checked in the near future and afforestation of denuded areas is taken up on a massive scale, the harshness of the climatic conditions and soil erosion by wind and water will increase to such an extent that agriculture, which is the mainstay of our people, will gradually become impossible. The desert countries of the world and our own desert areas in Rajasthan are a grim reminder of the consequences of large-scale deforestation. Pockets of desert-like landscape are now appearing in other parts of the country including the Sutlej-Ganga Plains and the Deccan Plateau. Where only a few decades back there used to be lush green forests with perennial streams and springs, there is only brown earth, bare of vegetation, without any water in the streams and springs except in the rainy season.

According to the passage given above, deforestation and denudation will ultimately lead to which of the following?

  1. 1.Depletion of soil resource
  2. 2.Shortage of land for the common man
  3. 3.Lack of water for cultivation

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only

The passage predicts “soil erosion by wind and water” and describes land left “without any water in the streams and springs except in the rainy season”, so soil and water are both lost. It says nothing about land becoming scarce for people.

  • ✓ 1. “Soil erosion by wind and water will increase”, leaving “brown earth, bare of vegetation” — the soil resource is depleted.
  • ✗ 2. The land does not disappear; it degrades so that agriculture becomes impossible. A shortage of land for the common man is not mentioned.
  • ✓ 3. Former perennial streams and springs now have no water “except in the rainy season”, and agriculture “will gradually become impossible”.

Remember · Pick only the consequences the passage actually describes; a plausible real-world effect missing from the text is out.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

“In simple matters like shoe-making, we think only a specially trained person will serve our purpose, but in politics, we presume that everyone who knows how to get votes knows how to administer a State. When we are ill, we call for a trained physician, whose degree is a guarantee of specific preparation and technical competence—we do not ask for the handsomest physician, or the most eloquent one: well then, when the whole State is ill should we not look for the service and guidance of the wisest and the best?”

Which one of the following statements best reflects the message of the author of the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) We need to devise a method of barring incompetence from public office.

The author contrasts our insistence on trained shoe-makers and physicians with our acceptance of anyone who can win votes as fit to run the State. The closing question asks for “the wisest and the best”, so the message is that incompetence must be kept out of public office.

  • ✗ (a) This is the presumption the author attacks (“we presume that everyone who knows how to get votes knows how to administer a State”). It describes the problem, not the message.
  • ✗ (b) Too narrow and specific. The author asks for “the wisest and the best”; the physician analogy is about proven competence, not a rule that politicians must come from administrative training.
  • ✓ (c) “Should we not look for the service and guidance of the wisest and the best?” implies that we must find a way to keep the incompetent from governing.
  • ✗ (d) Reverses the author’s view — the passage questions exactly the idea that winning votes proves fitness to govern.

Remember · In ‘message of the author’ items, the closing rhetorical question usually carries the message; options restating the criticised view are traps.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

The poverty line is quite unsatisfactory when it comes to grasping the extent of poverty in India. It is not only because of its extremely narrow definition of ‘who is poor’ and the debatable methodology used to count the poor, but also because of a more fundamental assumption underlying it. It exclusively relies on the notion of poverty as insufficient income or insufficient purchasing power. One can better categorize it by calling it income poverty. If poverty is ultimately about deprivations affecting human well-being, then income poverty is only one aspect of it. Poverty of a life, in our view, lies not merely in the impoverished state in which the person actually lives, but also in the lack of real opportunity given by social constraints as well as personal circumstances—to choose other types of living. Even the relevance of low incomes, meagre possessions, and other aspects of what are standardly seen as economic poverty relate ultimately to their role in curtailing capabilities, i.e., their role in severely restricting the choices people have to lead variable and valued lives.

Why is the methodology adopted in India to count the ‘poor’ debatable?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) It is based on the proposition of poverty as meagre income or buying capacity.

The passage’s criticism of how the poor are counted is that it “exclusively relies on the notion of poverty as insufficient income or insufficient purchasing power”. Of the four options, only this idea comes from the passage; the others bring in reasons it never mentions.

  • ✗ (a) The passage calls the definition “extremely narrow”, not confused; no confusion about what the line should be is mentioned.
  • ✗ (b) Rural–urban differences are not discussed anywhere in the passage.
  • ✗ (c) A global standard is never mentioned; this is outside the passage.
  • ✓ (d) The counting rests on “the notion of poverty as insufficient income or insufficient purchasing power” — that is, meagre income or buying capacity.

Remember · When every other option imports facts the passage never states, choose the one that paraphrases the passage’s own words.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

The poverty line is quite unsatisfactory when it comes to grasping the extent of poverty in India. It is not only because of its extremely narrow definition of ‘who is poor’ and the debatable methodology used to count the poor, but also because of a more fundamental assumption underlying it. It exclusively relies on the notion of poverty as insufficient income or insufficient purchasing power. One can better categorize it by calling it income poverty. If poverty is ultimately about deprivations affecting human well-being, then income poverty is only one aspect of it. Poverty of a life, in our view, lies not merely in the impoverished state in which the person actually lives, but also in the lack of real opportunity given by social constraints as well as personal circumstances—to choose other types of living. Even the relevance of low incomes, meagre possessions, and other aspects of what are standardly seen as economic poverty relate ultimately to their role in curtailing capabilities, i.e., their role in severely restricting the choices people have to lead variable and valued lives.

Why is income poverty only one measure of counting the ‘poor’?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) It talks of only one kind of deprivation ignoring all others.

If poverty is about all the deprivations that affect well-being, income poverty captures only one of them: “income poverty is only one aspect of it”. Other deprivations, such as the lack of real opportunity, are left out.

  • ✓ (a) “If poverty is ultimately about deprivations affecting human well-being, then income poverty is only one aspect of it” — one kind of deprivation, ignoring others such as lack of real opportunity.
  • ✗ (b) Too extreme. The passage links low incomes to “curtailing capabilities”; it never says other deprivations are unrelated to purchasing power.
  • ✗ (c) Whether income poverty is temporary or permanent is not discussed.
  • ✗ (d) “Only at a point of time” is not in the passage; the author’s point is about the narrow range of what is counted, not about timing.

Remember · Distrust absolute words like ‘nothing to do with’; passages rarely support such extremes.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

The poverty line is quite unsatisfactory when it comes to grasping the extent of poverty in India. It is not only because of its extremely narrow definition of ‘who is poor’ and the debatable methodology used to count the poor, but also because of a more fundamental assumption underlying it. It exclusively relies on the notion of poverty as insufficient income or insufficient purchasing power. One can better categorize it by calling it income poverty. If poverty is ultimately about deprivations affecting human well-being, then income poverty is only one aspect of it. Poverty of a life, in our view, lies not merely in the impoverished state in which the person actually lives, but also in the lack of real opportunity given by social constraints as well as personal circumstances—to choose other types of living. Even the relevance of low incomes, meagre possessions, and other aspects of what are standardly seen as economic poverty relate ultimately to their role in curtailing capabilities, i.e., their role in severely restricting the choices people have to lead variable and valued lives.

What does the author mean by ‘poverty of a life’?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) All deprivations in a human life which stem not only from lack of income but lack of real opportunities

The author says poverty of a life lies “not merely in the impoverished state in which the person actually lives, but also in the lack of real opportunity” to choose other ways of living. That means deprivation from lack of income and from lack of real opportunities together.

  • ✓ (a) Matches both halves of the definition: the impoverished state and “the lack of real opportunity given by social constraints as well as personal circumstances”.
  • ✗ (b) Covers only the first half (the impoverished state), and the rural–urban angle is not in the passage.
  • ✗ (c) Only a fragment: personal circumstances are one source of lost opportunity, and the impoverished state is left out.
  • ✗ (d) “Permanently” is added; the passage speaks of restricting choices, never of a permanent restriction.

Remember · For ‘what does the author mean by’ items, find the defining sentence and pick the option covering all its parts — nothing added.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage) — this item is based on it

In some places in the world, the productivity of staples such as rice and wheat has reached a plateau. Neither new strains nor fancy agrochemicals are raising the yields. Nor is there much unfarmed land left that is suitable to be brought under the plough. If global temperature continues to rise, some places will become unsuitable for farming. Application of technology can help overcome these problems. Agricultural technology is changing fast. Much of this change is brought about by affluent farmers in the West/Americas. Techniques developed in the West are being adapted in some places to make tropical crops more productive. Technology is of little use if it is not adapted. In the developing world, that applies as much to existing farming techniques as it does to the latest advances in genetic modification. Extending to the smallholders and subsistence farmers of Africa and Asia the best of today’s agricultural practices, in such simple matters as how much fertilizers to apply and when, would lead to a greatly increased availability of food for humanity. So would things like better roads and storage facilities, to allow for the carriage of surpluses to markets and reduce wastage.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Development of agricultural technology is confined to developed countries.
  2. 2.Agricultural technology is not adapted in developing countries.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2

The passage says “much” of the change comes from affluent farmers in the West — not all of it — and that Western techniques “are being adapted in some places”. Both assumptions overstate or contradict the text.

  • ✗ 1. “Much of this change is brought about by affluent farmers in the West/Americas” — much, not all. “Confined to” is too strong.
  • ✗ 2. Contradicted: “Techniques developed in the West are being adapted in some places to make tropical crops more productive.”

Remember · Assumptions using ‘confined to’, ‘only’ or ‘never’ fail when the passage says ‘much’, ‘some’ or ‘in some places’.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage) — this item is based on it

In some places in the world, the productivity of staples such as rice and wheat has reached a plateau. Neither new strains nor fancy agrochemicals are raising the yields. Nor is there much unfarmed land left that is suitable to be brought under the plough. If global temperature continues to rise, some places will become unsuitable for farming. Application of technology can help overcome these problems. Agricultural technology is changing fast. Much of this change is brought about by affluent farmers in the West/Americas. Techniques developed in the West are being adapted in some places to make tropical crops more productive. Technology is of little use if it is not adapted. In the developing world, that applies as much to existing farming techniques as it does to the latest advances in genetic modification. Extending to the smallholders and subsistence farmers of Africa and Asia the best of today’s agricultural practices, in such simple matters as how much fertilizers to apply and when, would lead to a greatly increased availability of food for humanity. So would things like better roads and storage facilities, to allow for the carriage of surpluses to markets and reduce wastage.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Poor countries need to bring about change in their existing farming techniques.
  2. 2.Developed countries have better infrastructure and they waste less food.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) 1 only

The author says technology is of little use unless it is adapted, and that in the developing world this applies “as much to existing farming techniques” — so poor countries must change how they farm. The passage makes no comparison of infrastructure or food waste with developed countries.

  • ✓ 1. Extending “the best of today’s agricultural practices”, such as how much fertilizer to apply and when, to smallholders in Africa and Asia would greatly raise food supply — the author takes it for granted that their present techniques need to change.
  • ✗ 2. Better roads and storage are recommended for the developing world, but the passage never says developed countries have better infrastructure or waste less food.

Remember · An assumption must be something the author’s argument needs; a comparison the passage never draws is not one.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage) — this item is based on it

In some places in the world, the productivity of staples such as rice and wheat has reached a plateau. Neither new strains nor fancy agrochemicals are raising the yields. Nor is there much unfarmed land left that is suitable to be brought under the plough. If global temperature continues to rise, some places will become unsuitable for farming. Application of technology can help overcome these problems. Agricultural technology is changing fast. Much of this change is brought about by affluent farmers in the West/Americas. Techniques developed in the West are being adapted in some places to make tropical crops more productive. Technology is of little use if it is not adapted. In the developing world, that applies as much to existing farming techniques as it does to the latest advances in genetic modification. Extending to the smallholders and subsistence farmers of Africa and Asia the best of today’s agricultural practices, in such simple matters as how much fertilizers to apply and when, would lead to a greatly increased availability of food for humanity. So would things like better roads and storage facilities, to allow for the carriage of surpluses to markets and reduce wastage.

Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Growing enough food for future generations will be a challenge.
  2. 2.Corporate farming is a viable option for food security in poor countries.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) 1 only

The passage opens with plateauing yields, little unfarmed land left and rising temperatures — the author assumes that feeding people in future will be hard. Corporate farming is never mentioned; the focus is on smallholders and subsistence farmers.

  • ✓ 1. Yields have “reached a plateau”, there is not “much unfarmed land left”, and some places “will become unsuitable for farming” — the case for technology rests on food supply becoming a challenge.
  • ✗ 2. The passage speaks of extending best practices to “smallholders and subsistence farmers”; corporate farming lies outside the passage.

Remember · Reject any assumption that brings in a new solution (here corporate farming) the author never discusses.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

Natural selection cannot anticipate future environments on the earth. Therefore, the set of existing organisms can never be fully prepared for environmental catastrophes that await life. An outcome of this is the extinction of those species which cannot overcome environmental adversity. This failure to survive, in modern terms, can be attributed to the genomes which are unable to withstand geological vagaries or biological mishaps (infections, diseases and so on). In biological evolution on the earth, extinction of species has been a major feature. The earth may presently have up to ten million species, yet more than 90% of species that have ever lived on the earth are now extinct. Once again, the creationist doctrines fail to satisfactorily address why a divine creator will firstly bother to create millions of species and then allow them to perish. The Darwinian explanation for extinct life is once again simple, elegant and at once convincing—organisms go extinct as a function of environmental or biological assaults for which their inheritance deems them ill-equipped. Therefore, the so-called Darwinian theory of evolution is not a theory at all. Evolution happens—this is a fact. The mechanism of evolution (Darwin proposed natural selection) is amply supported by scientific data. Indeed, to date no single zoological, botanical, geological, paleontological, genetic or physical evidence has refuted either of the central two main Darwinian ideas. If religion is not taken into consideration, Darwinian laws are acceptable just like the laws proposed by Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein—sets of natural laws that explain natural phenomena in the universe.

According to the passage, natural selection cannot anticipate future environments on the earth as

  1. 1.species not fully prepared to face the environmental changes that await them will face extinction
  2. 2.all the existing species would get extinct as their genomes will not withstand biological mishaps
  3. 3.inability of the genome to withstand environmental changes would result in extinction
  4. 4.extinction of species is a common feature

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) 1, 3 and 4

The passage says unprepared species go extinct, that this is due to genomes unable to withstand geological vagaries or biological mishaps, and that extinction “has been a major feature”. It never says that all existing species will go extinct.

  • ✓ 1. “The set of existing organisms can never be fully prepared for environmental catastrophes… An outcome of this is the extinction of those species which cannot overcome environmental adversity.”
  • ✗ 2. Too extreme: extinction is said to strike “those species which cannot overcome” adversity, not all existing species.
  • ✓ 3. “This failure to survive… can be attributed to the genomes which are unable to withstand geological vagaries or biological mishaps.”
  • ✓ 4. “Extinction of species has been a major feature”, and more than 90% of species that ever lived are now extinct.

Remember · Knock out the ‘all’ statement first: if the passage limits a claim to ‘those which…’, a universal claim fails.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

Natural selection cannot anticipate future environments on the earth. Therefore, the set of existing organisms can never be fully prepared for environmental catastrophes that await life. An outcome of this is the extinction of those species which cannot overcome environmental adversity. This failure to survive, in modern terms, can be attributed to the genomes which are unable to withstand geological vagaries or biological mishaps (infections, diseases and so on). In biological evolution on the earth, extinction of species has been a major feature. The earth may presently have up to ten million species, yet more than 90% of species that have ever lived on the earth are now extinct. Once again, the creationist doctrines fail to satisfactorily address why a divine creator will firstly bother to create millions of species and then allow them to perish. The Darwinian explanation for extinct life is once again simple, elegant and at once convincing—organisms go extinct as a function of environmental or biological assaults for which their inheritance deems them ill-equipped. Therefore, the so-called Darwinian theory of evolution is not a theory at all. Evolution happens—this is a fact. The mechanism of evolution (Darwin proposed natural selection) is amply supported by scientific data. Indeed, to date no single zoological, botanical, geological, paleontological, genetic or physical evidence has refuted either of the central two main Darwinian ideas. If religion is not taken into consideration, Darwinian laws are acceptable just like the laws proposed by Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein—sets of natural laws that explain natural phenomena in the universe.

The passage suggests that Darwinian theory of evolution is not a theory at all because

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) extinction is a function of environment and biological assaults

“Therefore, the so-called Darwinian theory of evolution is not a theory at all” follows directly from the Darwinian explanation that organisms go extinct “as a function of environmental or biological assaults”. That explanation, being simple and convincing, is what makes the author treat evolution as fact rather than theory.

  • ✗ (a) The author criticises creationist doctrines; failing to satisfy them is not offered as the reason.
  • ✓ (b) The “Therefore” rests on the preceding sentence: organisms go extinct “as a function of environmental or biological assaults for which their inheritance deems them ill-equipped”.
  • ✗ (c) That no evidence has refuted Darwin’s ideas comes later, as support for the mechanism of evolution; it is not the reason attached to “not a theory at all”.
  • ✗ (d) Reverses the passage — attributing organisms to a creator is the creationist view the author rejects.

Remember · For ‘why does the author say X’, read the sentence just before the ‘Therefore’ — that is the stated reason.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—1) — this item is based on it

Natural selection cannot anticipate future environments on the earth. Therefore, the set of existing organisms can never be fully prepared for environmental catastrophes that await life. An outcome of this is the extinction of those species which cannot overcome environmental adversity. This failure to survive, in modern terms, can be attributed to the genomes which are unable to withstand geological vagaries or biological mishaps (infections, diseases and so on). In biological evolution on the earth, extinction of species has been a major feature. The earth may presently have up to ten million species, yet more than 90% of species that have ever lived on the earth are now extinct. Once again, the creationist doctrines fail to satisfactorily address why a divine creator will firstly bother to create millions of species and then allow them to perish. The Darwinian explanation for extinct life is once again simple, elegant and at once convincing—organisms go extinct as a function of environmental or biological assaults for which their inheritance deems them ill-equipped. Therefore, the so-called Darwinian theory of evolution is not a theory at all. Evolution happens—this is a fact. The mechanism of evolution (Darwin proposed natural selection) is amply supported by scientific data. Indeed, to date no single zoological, botanical, geological, paleontological, genetic or physical evidence has refuted either of the central two main Darwinian ideas. If religion is not taken into consideration, Darwinian laws are acceptable just like the laws proposed by Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein—sets of natural laws that explain natural phenomena in the universe.

With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. 1.Only species that have the ability to overcome environmental catastrophes will survive and perpetuate.
  2. 2.More than 90% of the species on the earth are in the danger of getting extinct due to drastic changes in the environment.
  3. 3.Darwin’s theory explains all the natural phenomena.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) 1 only

The passage implies that only species able to overcome environmental adversity survive. The 90% figure is about species that ever lived and are now extinct, not present species at risk, and the passage never claims Darwin’s theory explains all natural phenomena.

  • ✓ 1. Extinction is “the extinction of those species which cannot overcome environmental adversity”; so only those that can overcome it survive and carry on.
  • ✗ 2. Misreads the figure: “more than 90% of species that have ever lived on the earth are now extinct” is about the past, not about present species being in danger.
  • ✗ 3. Overreach: Darwinian laws are compared with the laws of Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein that “explain natural phenomena”; the passage does not say Darwin’s theory explains all of them.

Remember · Check what a statistic actually counts; wrong options often shift its time frame or the group it covers.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Read the passage (Passage—2) — this item is based on it

With steady economic growth, higher literacy and increasing skill levels, the number of Indian middle-class families has gone up exponentially. Direct results of the affluence have been changes in dietary patterns and energy consumption levels. People have moved to a higher protein-based diet like milk products, fish and meat, all of which need significantly more water to produce than cereal-based diets. Increasing use of electronic and electric machines/gadgets and motor vehicles needs more and more energy and generation of energy needs water.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the crux of the passage?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) Water management practices in India need to change dramatically in the coming years.

Both changes the passage describes — protein-rich diets that need more water, and more gadgets and vehicles whose energy needs water to generate — end in rising demand for water. The crux is that India must manage water very differently.

  • ✗ (a) The passage describes the move to protein-rich diets; it does not argue for persuading people back to cereal diets.
  • ✗ (b) Farm productivity and energy capacity are not the focus; the passage points to water as the common need behind both trends.
  • ✗ (c) The passage links affluence, not technology, to changing habits, and the change it stresses is the resulting demand for water.
  • ✓ (d) Diets that “need significantly more water” and energy whose “generation… needs water” both point to a growing water demand that current practices must be changed to meet.

Remember · For ‘crux’ items, find the idea every sentence leads to — here each trend ends in ‘water’.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·