Minimalist IAS
2019 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2019 · GS Paper II · Question 13

“The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self-government has had a limited impact on…

Syllabus line: Federalism & devolution — “Functions and responsibilities of the Union and the States, issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure, devolution of powers and finances up to local levels and challenges therein.”

GS Paper II 2019 · Q13

15 marks · 250 words Federalism & devolution

“The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self-government has had a limited impact on the patriarchal character of the Indian Political Process.” Comment.

Approach · directive: “comment”

What it asks · Comment on the statement by weighing the gains of one-third (in many States one-half) reservation in Panchayats and municipalities against persisting proxy rule, weak devolution and unchanged party structures.

The question has 3 parts — answer each

  1. Comment on what reservation of seats for women in local self-government has achieved
  2. Comment on why its impact on the patriarchal character of the political process has been limited
  3. Suggest what would deepen the impact

Open with · The 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992) reserved not less than one-third of seats for women in Panchayats and municipalities, creating a large cadre of women representatives.

Cover

  • Gains: many women entered local office, some States went beyond the constitutional minimum to fifty per cent, and studies in West Bengal and Rajasthan (Chattopadhyay and Duflo) found women-led councils invested more in drinking water.
  • Capacity and confidence: training, self-help groups and Kerala's Kudumbashree have built women's leadership and public confidence.
  • Proxy rule: ‘sarpanch-pati’ practices, with male relatives taking decisions, and women's low literacy, mobility limits and household burdens restrict real power.
  • Structure: rotation of seats discourages long-term leadership, and weak devolution of funds, functions and functionaries leaves little to control.
  • Wider politics: women won 78 of the 542 seats filled in the 2019 Lok Sabha (about 14 per cent), and party leadership remains male-dominated despite local quotas.
  • Social barriers: caste and class hierarchies, harassment of Dalit and tribal women leaders, and household duties limit participation.
  • Way forward: training, action against proxy rule, longer tenure of reserved seats, real devolution, and legislative reservation under the 106th Amendment once implemented.

Close with · Reservation has widened women's presence and shifted local agendas, but patriarchy loosens only when devolution, education, party reform and social norms change alongside quotas.

Add value (verified)

  • Article 243D(3) fixes the one-third reservation for women in every Panchayat and allows the reserved seats to be rotated among constituencies, the source of both the gain and the tenure problem. The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2024), Article 243D(3) - Legislative Department ↗“of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Panchayat shall be reserved for women and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Panchayat”

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2019, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 267 words (UPSC limit 250) · Minimalist IAS

The 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992) reserved not less than one-third of seats in Panchayats and municipalities for women (Article 243D(3) for Panchayats), bringing lakhs of women into elected office; the question is whether presence has become power.

What reservation has changed

  • Presence: women now hold office in every tier of local government, and some States have raised the quota to fifty per cent.
  • Priorities: Chattopadhyay and Duflo found that women-led councils in West Bengal and Rajasthan invested more in drinking water, a need women rank highly.
  • Capacity: training, self-help groups and Kerala's Kudumbashree have built women's confidence and public leadership.

Why patriarchy persists

  • Proxy rule: the ‘sarpanch-pati’ practice, in which husbands or male relatives take decisions, reinforced by women's lower literacy, restricted mobility and household burdens.
  • Rotation: Article 243D(3) allows reserved seats to rotate among constituencies, so women rarely build a durable base or contest an unreserved seat.
  • Little to control: weak devolution of funds, functions and functionaries leaves Panchayats with few real decisions to take.
  • No spill-over: women won 78 of the 542 seats filled in the 2019 Lok Sabha (about 14 per cent), and party organisations remain male-dominated.
  • Social hierarchy: Dalit and tribal women leaders face caste-based harassment, and household duties limit participation.

Way forward

  • Train elected women, penalise proxy rule, give reserved seats a longer tenure, devolve real powers, and implement legislative reservation (since then enacted as the 106th Amendment, 2023).

Reservation has widened women's presence and shifted local agendas, but the patriarchal character of politics changes only when quotas are joined to devolution, education, party reform and a shift in social norms.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify). UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Federalism & devolution →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this