Minimalist IAS
2019 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2019 · GS Paper II · Question 14

“The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India.” Discuss.

Syllabus line: Constitutional bodies — “Appointment to various Constitutional posts, powers, functions and responsibilities of various Constitutional Bodies.”

GS Paper II 2019 · Q14

15 marks · 250 words Constitutional bodies

“The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India.” Discuss.

Approach · directive: “discuss”

What it asks · Discuss the Attorney-General's constitutional position: appointment, duties, rights in Parliament and courts, and the limits and questions surrounding the office.

The question has 3 parts — answer each

  1. Discuss the Attorney-General as chief legal adviser: appointment, tenure and advisory duties under Article 76
  2. Discuss the Attorney-General as the Government's lawyer: rights in courts and Parliament, and the restrictions on him
  3. Discuss the limits of the office and the questions about its independence

Open with · Article 76 creates the office of Attorney-General for India; the phrase ‘chief legal adviser and lawyer’ sums up his twin duties of advice and representation, though Article 76 does not use those words.

Cover

  • Appointment and tenure: the President appoints a person qualified to be a Supreme Court judge; he holds office during the President's pleasure (Article 76).
  • Adviser: he advises the Government on legal matters referred to him and performs other legal duties the President assigns (Article 76(2)).
  • Lawyer: right of audience in all courts in India (Article 76(3)); he represents the Union in the Supreme Court and in Article 143 references.
  • In Parliament: he may speak in either House, joint sittings and committees he is named to, with parliamentary privileges, but cannot vote (Articles 88, 105).
  • Restrictions: by convention and terms of appointment, he should not advise against the Union or defend accused persons in criminal cases without government consent.
  • Independence: with no fixed tenure and appointment on the Government's choice, his advice can appear political, though he is not a Minister.
  • Comparison: the State counterpart is the Advocate General (Article 165), appointed by the Governor; the Attorney-General's opinion is advisory, not binding.

Close with · The statement is broadly right: the Attorney-General is the Government's principal legal adviser and advocate, but the value of the office lies in independent, candid advice, which needs strong conventions.

Add value (verified)

  • Article 76(2) defines the Attorney-General's duty as giving advice to the Government of India on legal matters referred to him and performing other legal duties assigned by the President; the words ‘chief legal adviser’ do not appear in it. The Constitution of India (as on 1 May 2024), Article 76(2) - Legislative Department ↗“to give advice to the Government of India upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal character, as may from time to time be referred or assigned to him by the President”

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2019, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 288 words (UPSC limit 250) · Minimalist IAS

Article 76 creates the office of the Attorney-General for India, the highest law officer of the Union; the phrase ‘chief legal adviser and lawyer’ captures his two roles of advice and representation, though the Article itself does not use those words.

Chief legal adviser

  • Appointment: the President appoints a person qualified to be a Supreme Court judge; he holds office during the President's pleasure.
  • Duties (Article 76(2)): to advise the Government of India on legal matters referred to him and to perform other duties of a legal character assigned by the President; his opinion is advisory, not binding.
  • He is not a Minister or a member of the Cabinet, so his advice is expected to be professional rather than political.

Government's lawyer

  • Right of audience in every court in India (Article 76(3)); he appears for the Union in the Supreme Court, including in Presidential references under Article 143.
  • In Parliament: he may speak and take part in either House, joint sittings and committees of which he is named a member, with the privileges of a member, but cannot vote (Articles 88, 105).
  • Restrictions by convention and terms of appointment: he must not advise or appear against the Government of India, nor defend accused persons in criminal cases without its consent.

Limits and concerns

  • No fixed tenure and appointment on the Government's choice make the office look political; its independence rests on personal integrity and convention rather than on the text.
  • The State counterpart, the Advocate-General (Article 165), appointed by the Governor, plays a similar role.

The statement is broadly right: the Attorney-General is the Union's principal adviser and advocate; the worth of the office lies in candid, independent counsel, which stronger conventions on appointment and tenure would protect.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Constitutional bodies →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this