Minimalist IAS
Polity & governance

Prelims · Polity & governance · 23 questions

Elections, rights issues & governance

Every UPSC Prelims question on this topic, 2016–2026, newest first. Tap an option to check yourself; the answer and explanation open below it.

Elections, rights issues & governance questions per year: 2016: 0, 2017: 4, 2018: 0, 2019: 0, 2020: 3, 2021: 1, 2022: 0, 2023: 1, 2024: 1, 2025: 0, 2026: 4 Asked in 6 of 11 years · most in 2026 (4)

Practising Polity & governance? Take it as timed sets of 25 →

UPSC syllabus: “Indian Polity and Governance-Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc.” Sub-topics in the detailed syllabus →

निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार कीजिए :

  1. कथन–I: भारत में, दैनंदिन जेल-प्रशासन के लिए, जेलों का अनुरक्षण राज्य सरकारें अपने नियमों और विनियमों से करती हैं।
  2. कथन–II: भारत में, जेल का नियंत्रण जेल अधिनियम, 1894 द्वारा किया जाता है, जिससे जेल का विषय स्पष्ट रूप से प्रांतीय सरकारों के नियंत्रण में रहा।

उपर्युक्त कथनों के बारे में, निम्नलिखित में से कौन-सा एक सही है?

Read this question in English

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I. In India, prisons are managed by State Governments with their own rules and regulations for the day-to-day administration of prisons.

Statement-II. In India, prisons are governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 which expressly kept the subject of prisons in the control of Provincial Governments.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

(a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I · (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I · (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect · (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

उत्तर और व्याख्या · explanation in English

Answer: (a) कथन–I और कथन–II दोनों सही हैं तथा कथन–II, कथन–I की सही व्याख्या है

Why not the tempting option · UPSC's key is (a). The 1894 Act does not use the words 'expressly kept', but it does expressly vest prisons in the provincial (now State) government: section 3 makes a prison a place used under that government's orders and section 59 gives it the rule-making power, so Statement II is a fair description. Option (b) fails because that rule-making power is precisely why each State has its own rules (Statement I); the State List entry of 1950 added the constitutional footing. In the exam, treat a statement as 'expressly' true when the Act's sections say it, even if not in those words.

Prisons are a State subject, and each State runs its prisons under its own manual and rules. The Prisons Act, 1894 is the framework law that placed prisons under the provincial (now State) government: a prison is a place used under that government's orders, and section 59 gives it the power to make the rules. That is exactly why States have their own rules, so Statement II explains Statement I.

  • ✓ Statement-I 'Prisons' is in the State List of the Seventh Schedule. The Ministry of Home Affairs says management and administration lie exclusively with State Governments, under the 1894 Act and each State's Prison Manual.
  • ✓ Statement-II The Act vests prisons in the provincial government throughout: section 3 defines a prison as a place used under the orders of the (then provincial, now State) Government, and section 59 says the State Government may make rules consistent with the Act. So it kept the subject under provincial control; Entry 4 of the State List later gave this constitutional footing.
  • ✓ (a) Statement-II is the legal reason for Statement-I: the 1894 Act's rule-making power is why each State has its own prison rules.
  • ✗ (b) This option accepts both statements but treats Statement-II as unrelated to Statement-I. The two are directly linked.

Remember · Prisons: State List, Seventh Schedule. States run them under the Prisons Act, 1894 and their own Prison Manuals; the Centre only advises (e.g. Model Prison Manual, 2016).

Sources

  • Scheme of Modernisation of Prisons (Ministry of Home Affairs) ↗ “The management and administration of Prisons falls exclusively in the domain of the State Governments, and is governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 and the Prison Manuals of the respective State Governments.”
  • The Prisons Act, 1894, section 3 (Ministry of Home Affairs copy) ↗ ““prison” means any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of a State Government for the detention of prisoners … Power to make rules.—[The State Government may] make rules consistent with this Act— (1) defining the act which shall constitute prison-offences; (2) determining the classification of prison-offences into serious and minor offences”

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper I (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

भारत के संदर्भ में, निम्नलिखित युग्मों पर विचार कीजिए :

कृत्ययह कृत्य जिस अधिनियम के अधीन आता है
1.अनधिकृत रूप से पुलिस या सेना की वर्दी को पहननाशासकीय गुप्त बात अधिनियम, 1923
2.किसी पुलिस अधिकारी या सैनिक अधिकारी के ड्यूटी में तैनात होने के दौरान जान-बूझ कर उन्हें गुमराह करना या अन्यथा उनके साथ हस्तक्षेप करनाभारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872
3.बंदूक/तोप से अनुष्ठानपरक गोली/गोला दागना जिससे अन्य लोगों की वैयक्तिक सुरक्षा के लिए जोखिम हो सकता होआयुध (संशोधन) अधिनियम, 2019

उपर्युक्त में से कितने युग्म सही सुमेलित हैं?

Read this question in English

With reference to India, consider the following pairs:

1. Unauthorized wearing of police or military uniforms — The Official Secrets Act, 1923

2. Knowingly misleading or otherwise interfering with a police officer or military officer when engaged in their duties — The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

3. Celebratory gunfire which can endanger the personal safety of others — The Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

(a) Only one · (b) Only two · (c) All three · (d) None

उत्तर और व्याख्या · explanation in English

Answer: (b) केवल दो

Pairs 1 and 3 are correct; pair 2 is wrong. Misleading or interfering with police or armed-forces personnel on guard near a prohibited place is an offence under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, not the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which only lays down rules of evidence in court.

  • ✓ 1. Section 6 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 punishes wearing, without lawful authority, any naval, military, air force, police or other official uniform for the purposes the section lists.
  • ✗ 2. Section 7 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (interfering with officers of the police or members of the Armed Forces) bars anyone near a prohibited place from obstructing, knowingly misleading or otherwise interfering with them. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has no such offence.
  • ✓ 3. The Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019 added sub-section (9) to section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959: using a firearm in celebratory gunfire so as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others is punishable with up to two years' imprisonment, a fine up to rupees one lakh, or both.

Remember · Uniform misuse and interference with police or armed forces near a prohibited place: Official Secrets Act, 1923 (sections 6 and 7). Celebratory gunfire: Arms Act, 1959 section 25(9), inserted in 2019.

Sources

  • Ministry of Home Affairs: The Official Secrets Act, 1923, section 6 ↗ “uses or wears, without lawful authority, any naval, military, air force, police or other official uniform, or any uniform so nearly resembling the same as to be calculated to deceive … 7. Interfering with officers of the police or members of the Armed forces of the Union. (1) No person in the vicinity of any prohibited place shall obstruct, knowingly mislead or otherwise interfere with or impede,”
  • The Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019 (MHA), inserting section 25(9) ↗ “Whoever uses firearm in a rash or negligent manner or in celebratory gunfire so as to endanger human life or personal safety of others shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years”

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper I (2023, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

The Syllabus X-Ray of this topic

2 of its 8 sub-topics are High

0 Core · 2 High · 3 Steady · 3 Rare

  • HighElections & the Representation of the People Act · 5 questions
  • HighGovernance, transparency & e-governance · 5 questions

The X-Ray ranks all 928 sub-topics of the UPSC syllabus by what UPSC has asked since 2016. The 60 Prelims Core sub-topics are behind 51% of Prelims questions.

See the whole X-Ray →