Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2017 GS Paper IV

UPSC CSE (Main) 2017 · GS Paper IV · Question 1

How can this conflict in administration be resolved ? Describe with an example.

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2017, General Studies Paper IV (GS 4), Question 1 of Section A — 10 marks, 150 words.

Syllabus line: Probity in governance — “Probity in Governance: Concept of public service; Philosophical basis of governance and probity; Information sharing and transparency in government, Right to Information, Codes of Ethics, Codes of Conduct, Citizen’s Charters, Work culture, Quality of service delivery, Utilization of public funds, challenges of corruption.”

GS Paper IV 2017 · Q1 (Section A)

10 marks · 150 words Probity in governance X-Ray · Core #1

Conflict of interest in the public sector arises when (a) official duties, (b) public interest, and (c) personal interest are taking priority one above the other.

How can this conflict in administration be resolved ? Describe with an example.

Approach · directive: “how / describe with an example”

What it asks · Explain how an officer should resolve a clash between official duty, public interest and personal interest, and illustrate it with one example.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. How: explain how a clash between official duty, public interest and personal interest is resolved in administration
  2. Describe the resolution with an example

Open with · Define a conflict of interest as a private interest that could sway, or appear to sway, public duty; a table then ranks the three interests and their stakeholders.

Cover

  • Table: public interest (citizens) ranks first, official duty (department, rules) second, personal interest (officer, family) last.
  • Disclose: the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 make a Government servant declare private interests (Rule 3(1)) and refer family-linked matters to a superior (Rule 4(3)).
  • Recuse: step aside from the file, since no one may judge his own cause.
  • Duty versus public interest: use lawful discretion, record reasons and seek orders, never a silent bypass of the rule.
  • Systemic safeguards: asset declarations, gift rules, rotation of postings and e-tendering shrink discretion.
  • Example: an officer on a tender committee recuses over a relative's bid; A.K. Kraipak (1969) shows that an undeclared conflict can void the decision.

Close with · Integrity lies not in having no private interests but in resolving them openly; disclosure, recusal and rule-bound systems show that public decisions serve only the public.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2017, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 222words · Minimalist IAS

A conflict of interest arises when a private interest could sway, or appear to sway, public duty. In a clash, the three interests rank in a fixed order:

InterestStakeholderRank
Public interestCitizensFirst
Official dutyDepartment, rulesSecond
Personal interestOfficer, familyLast

How the conflict in administration is resolved

  • Disclose: the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 require a Government servant to "declare any private interests relating to his public duties" (Rule 3(1)) and to refer family-linked matters to his superior (Rule 4(3)).
  • Recuse: leave the file, since no one may judge his own cause.
  • Duty against public interest: where a rule's letter defeats its purpose, use lawful discretion, record reasons and seek orders, never a silent bypass.
  • Systemic safeguards: asset declarations, gift rules, rotation and e-tendering shrink the discretion where conflicts grow.

The resolution, with an example

  • A tender committee: a district officer finds a relative's firm among the bidders. She records the tie and recuses; a reconstituted panel decides on merit. Had she stayed, the award could fall: in A.K. Kraipak (1969), the Supreme Court set aside selections because a board member, himself a candidate, had "a conflict between his interest and duty".

Integrity lies not in having no private interests but in resolving them openly; disclosure, recusal and rule-bound systems show that public decisions serve only the public.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 1 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-4 2017, Q1 (Section A) — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2017/gs4/q1 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 150 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 150 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Probity in governance →

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →