Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2017 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2017 · GS Paper II · Question 7

Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanism for empowerment and…

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2017, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 7 — 10 marks, 150 words.

Syllabus line: Welfare of vulnerable sections — “Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections.”

GS Paper II 2017 · Q7

10 marks · 150 words Welfare of vulnerable sections

Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanism for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss.

Approach · directive: “discuss”

What it asks · Explain the mechanisms the Act provides for rights, reservation, education, accessibility and redress, and assess how far implementation and enforcement fall short.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. Discuss the mechanisms the RPwD Act, 2016 provides for empowerment and inclusion
  2. Assess whether they work in practice: gaps in implementation and enforcement, with a reasoned view and way forward

Open with · Article 41 directs public assistance in cases of disablement; the RPwD Act, 2016, enacted to implement the UN Convention India ratified on 1 October 2007, turns welfare into rights.

Cover

  • Wider coverage: recognised disabilities rise from 7 to 21, including autism, specific learning disability and acid attack victims.
  • Rights core: discrimination includes denial of reasonable accommodation; limited guardianship means joint decision-making, respecting legal capacity.
  • Affirmative action: at least 4% of government vacancies (Section 34) and 5% of higher-education seats for persons with benchmark disabilities.
  • Accessibility: existing public buildings to be made accessible within five years of the rules (Section 45).
  • Redress: Chief and State Commissioners, a Special Court for each district (Section 84) and a National Fund.
  • Gaps: compliance with accessibility deadlines and job quotas, certification, awareness, complaint-driven remedies and the capacity of Commissioners.
  • Way forward: fund and audit accessibility, special recruitment drives, simpler certification and stronger Commissioners.

Close with · The Act exists to implement the UN Convention; empowerment will be real when accessibility is funded and audited and persons with disabilities are treated as rights-holders, not beneficiaries.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2017, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 226words · Minimalist IAS

Article 41 directs public assistance in cases of 'sickness and disablement'. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, enacted to implement the UN Convention India ratified on 1 October 2007, turns this welfare duty into rights.

Mechanisms the Act provides

  • Wider coverage: recognised disabilities rise from 7 to 21, including autism and acid attack victims.
  • Rights core: discrimination includes denial of reasonable accommodation; limited guardianship means joint decisions, respecting legal capacity.
  • Affirmative action: at least 4% of government vacancies (Section 34) and 5% of higher-education seats.
  • Accessibility: existing public buildings accessible within five years of the rules (Section 45).
  • Redress: Chief and State Commissioners, a Special Court for each district (Section 84) and a National Fund.

Does it work in practice?

MechanismOn paperOn the ground
AccessibilityFive-year deadlineCompliance to be audited
Jobs4% reservationQuota filling to be tracked
RedressCommissioners, Special CourtsComplaint-driven; capacity matters
  • Burden on the victim: complaint-driven remedies leave enforcement to the excluded.
  • Real gain: courts and Commissioners can now compel action, not merely request it.

Way forward

  • Fund and audit accessibility: time-bound budgets for buildings, transport and websites.
  • Strengthen enforcement: special recruitment drives, simpler certification, and Commissioners with staff and funds.

The Act gives the framework, not yet the outcome; inclusion will be real when persons with disabilities are treated as rights-holders, with access funded and audited.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2017, Q7 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2017/gs2/q7 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 150 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 150 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Welfare of vulnerable sections →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →