Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2016 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2016 · GS Paper II · Question 6

What was held in the Coelho case? In this context, can you say that judicial review is of key importance…

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2016, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 6 — 12.5 marks, 200 words.

Syllabus line: Constitution: evolution, features & basic structure — “Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure.”

GS Paper II 2016 · Q6

12½ marks · 200 words Constitution: evolution, features & basic structure X-Ray · Core #32

What was held in the Coelho case? In this context, can you say that judicial review is of key importance amongst the basic features of the Constitution?

Approach · directive: “what / can you say”

What it asks · State the holding in I.R. Coelho (2007) on Ninth Schedule laws, then argue whether judicial review deserves a special place among the basic features.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. What: the holding in I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) on Ninth Schedule laws
  2. Can you say: whether judicial review is of key importance among the basic features, with a reasoned position

Open with · Article 31B, inserted by the First Amendment (1951), shields Ninth Schedule laws; in I.R. Coelho (2007) a nine-judge Bench decided whether that shield is absolute.

Cover

  • Background: Article 31B (First Amendment, 1951) saves Ninth Schedule laws from being void for violating fundamental rights.
  • Holding: power to grant absolute immunity at will is incompatible with the basic structure; post-24 April 1973 laws can be challenged.
  • Test: the law's effect on rights reflected in Articles 14, 19 and 21; only an independent judiciary can judge limits on rights.
  • Why 'key': review enforces every other basic feature; Minerva Mills (1980), L. Chandra Kumar (1997) and NJAC (2015) confirm it.
  • Limits: no hierarchy among basic features; review must respect the separation of powers and practise restraint.
  • Visual: timeline from the First Amendment (1951) to Coelho (2007).

Close with · Ambedkar called Article 32 the very soul and heart of the Constitution; Coelho carries that promise to every law, however shielded, while review keeps its legitimacy through restraint.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2016, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 283words · Minimalist IAS

Article 31B, inserted by the First Amendment (1951), shields laws placed in the Ninth Schedule from being declared void for violating fundamental rights. In I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), a nine-judge Bench decided whether that shield is absolute, and its answer shows why judicial review sits at the core of the basic structure.

What was held in the Coelho case

  • No blanket immunity: the power to grant absolute immunity at will is incompatible with the basic structure doctrine.
  • Cut-off date: laws added to the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973, the date of Kesavananda Bharati, can be challenged.
  • Test of effect: such a law fails if it damages the basic structure as reflected in Articles 14, 19 and 21.
  • Checks and balances: only an independent judiciary can judge the limits placed on rights.
1951First Amendmentinserts Article31B1973KesavanandaBharati1980Minerva Mills1997L. ChandraKumar2007I.R. Coelho
  1. 1951: First Amendment inserts Article 31B
  2. 1973: Kesavananda Bharati
  3. 1980: Minerva Mills
  4. 1997: L. Chandra Kumar
  5. 2007: I.R. Coelho

Is judicial review of key importance among the basic features?

  • Guardian of the rest: federalism, secularism and fundamental rights stay declarations unless a court can strike down breaches.
  • Settled precedent: Minerva Mills (1980) and L. Chandra Kumar (1997) treated review as essential; the NJAC ruling (2015) guarded the judicial independence it rests on.

The limits of that primacy

  • No hierarchy: democracy, federalism and secularism are equally basic; review protects them, it does not outrank them.
  • Restraint: review must respect the separation of powers, or the Court becomes a super-legislature.

Yes, judicial review is the keystone of the basic structure, provided it stays restrained. Ambedkar called Article 32 "the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it"; Coelho extends that promise to every law, however shielded.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2016, Q6 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2016/gs2/q6 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 200 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 200 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Constitution: evolution, features & basic structure →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →