Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2016 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2016 · GS Paper II · Question 15

Examine the main provisions of the National Child Policy and throw light on the status of its implementation.

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2016, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 15 — 12.5 marks, 200 words.

Syllabus line: Welfare of vulnerable sections — “Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections.”

GS Paper II 2016 · Q15

12½ marks · 200 words Welfare of vulnerable sections

Examine the main provisions of the National Child Policy and throw light on the status of its implementation.

Approach · directive: “examine / throw light on”

What it asks · Set out the main provisions of the National Policy for Children, 2013 and assess how far they have been implemented, with gaps.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. Examine the main provisions of the National Policy for Children, 2013
  2. Throw light on the status of its implementation: gains, gaps and the way forward

Open with · The National Policy for Children, 2013 replaced the 1974 policy with a rights-based framework for every person below 18, building on Article 45.

Cover

  • Provisions: rights-based approach, non-discrimination and the best interests of the child; special care for vulnerable groups.
  • Visual: a hub of the four priority areas: survival, health and nutrition; education and development; protection; participation.
  • Machinery: a National Plan of Action (launched January 2017) and State plans, coordinated by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, with the NCPCR as watchdog.
  • Gains: RTE Act 2009, POCSO Act 2012, Juvenile Justice Act 2015 and the 2016 child labour amendment; ICDS, mid-day meals, immunisation; stunting 38.4% (NFHS-4) to 35.5% (NFHS-5).
  • Gaps: child labour, trafficking and child marriage persist; learning lags enrolment; uneven State plans, small budgets, poor convergence and thin local monitoring.
  • Way forward: funded State plans, convergence at the Anganwadi, and village-level vigilance with NFHS-based tracking.

Close with · SDG target 16.2, ending abuse, exploitation, trafficking and violence against children, will test whether the 2013 policy reaches every village.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2016, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 278words · Minimalist IAS

The National Policy for Children, 2013 replaced the 1974 policy and treats every person below 18 as a rights-holder. It builds on Article 45, which asks the State to provide early childhood care and education until children complete six years.

Main provisions of the National Child Policy

  • Rights-based approach: non-discrimination and the best interests of the child guide all action.
  • Special care: priority for vulnerable and disadvantaged children.
Survival, healthand nutritionEducation anddevelopmentProtectionParticipationFour priorityareas of…

Four priority areas of NPC 2013: Survival, health and nutrition; Education and development; Protection; Participation

  • Machinery: a National Plan of Action (launched January 2017) and State plans, coordinated by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, with the NCPCR as watchdog.

Status of implementation: the gains

  • Legal shield: the RTE Act 2009, POCSO Act 2012, Juvenile Justice Act 2015 and the 2016 amendment barring employment of children below 14 in all occupations except family help after school hours.
  • Programmes: ICDS, mid-day meals and immunisation support survival, nutrition and learning.
  • Nutrition: NFHS-4 (2015-16) found 38.4% of under-fives stunted (since then, NFHS-5 (2019-21) recorded 35.5%).

Status of implementation: the gaps

  • Persisting harms: child labour, trafficking and child marriage continue; learning outcomes lag enrolment.
  • Weak links: uneven State plans, small budgets, poor convergence across departments and thin village-level monitoring.

Way forward

  • Funded State plans: time-bound targets with a child budget for each priority area.
  • Convergence at the Anganwadi: health, nutrition and early learning delivered at one point.
  • Community vigilance: village-level child protection committees, with NFHS data tracking progress.

SDG target 16.2 aims to 'End abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children'. Meeting it will test whether the 2013 policy reaches every village, not just the statute book.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2016, Q15 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2016/gs2/q15 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 200 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 200 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Welfare of vulnerable sections →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →