Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2024 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2024 · GS Paper II · Question 1

Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to “one…

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 1 — 10 marks, 150 words.

Syllabus line: Representation of the People Act — “Salient features of the Representation of People’s Act.”

GS Paper II 2024 · Q1

10 marks · 150 words Representation of the People Act X-Ray · Core #57

Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to “one nation – one election” principle.

Approach · directive: “examine”

What it asks · Examine why electoral reforms recommended by successive committees are needed, with a focused look at the case for and against simultaneous elections.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. Examine: why electoral reforms recommended by various committees are needed
  2. With particular reference to 'one nation – one election': the case for it, the concerns, and what it would require

Open with · Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were held together from 1951 to 1967 until premature dissolutions broke the cycle; committees since have sought to reform how, not just when, India votes.

Cover

  • Committee agenda: Dinesh Goswami (1990) and Indrajit Gupta (1998) on state funding; Law Commission's 170th Report (1999) and the 2nd ARC on cleaner politics.
  • Persistent needs: money power, criminalisation, paid news, opaque party funding, weak inner-party democracy; frequent Model Code of Conduct freezes.
  • Timeline: simultaneous polls 1951–67; Law Commission 170th Report (1999); Standing Committee 79th Report (2015); Kovind committee (2024).
  • Kovind plan: Lok Sabha and Assembly polls together, local bodies within 100 days, single electoral roll; Cabinet accepted it in September 2024.
  • Gains: lower cost, fewer policy pauses, less diversion of security forces and staff, a longer governance horizon.
  • Concerns: national issues may drown State issues; one-time curtailment of Assembly terms; fresh polls only for the unexpired term.
  • Requirements: amendments to Articles 83 and 172, ratification by half the States for the single roll, EVMs and VVPATs, consensus.

Close with · Synchronised polls fix the calendar; only cleaner money and candidates fix the contest. Together they serve SDG 16.7: responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2024, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 223words · Minimalist IAS

Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were held together from 1951 to 1967, until premature dissolutions broke the cycle. Committees since have sought to reform how, not just when, India votes.

Why committees urged reform

  • Money power: the Dinesh Goswami (1990) and Indrajit Gupta (1998) committees backed state funding of elections.
  • Criminalisation: the Law Commission's 170th Report (1999) and the 2nd ARC sought cleaner politics; paid news persists.
  • Permanent campaign: frequent polls keep the Model Code of Conduct in force, pausing new projects and diverting security forces.

The case for 'one nation – one election'

1951–67simultaneous polls1999Law Commission2015Standing Committee2024Kovind committee
  1. 1951–67: simultaneous polls
  2. 1999: Law Commission
  3. 2015: Standing Committee
  4. 2024: Kovind committee
  • Kovind committee (2024): Lok Sabha and Assembly polls first, local-body polls within 100 days, one single electoral roll; Cabinet-accepted in September 2024.
  • Gains: lower cost, fewer pauses, a longer governance horizon.

Concerns and requirements

  • Federal balance: national issues may drown State issues; some Assembly terms must be cut once.
  • Mid-term collapse: fresh polls only for the unexpired term mean short mandates.
  • Amendments: Articles 83 and 172; the single roll needs ratification by half the States; more EVMs and VVPATs.

Way forward

  • Consensus first: synchronise by cross-party agreement, alongside pending funding and criminalisation reforms.

Synchronised polls fix the calendar; only cleaner money and candidates fix the contest. Together they serve SDG 16.7: responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2024, Q1 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2024/gs2/q1 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 150 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 150 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Representation of the People Act →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →