Minimalist IAS
Sign upрд╕рд╛рдЗрди рдЕрдк
2024 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2024 ┬╖ GS Paper II ┬╖ Question 19

тАШTerrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security.тАЩ Evaluate the effectiveness of theтАж

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 19 тАФ 15 marks, 250 words.

Syllabus line: International institutions тАФ тАЬImportant International institutions, agencies and fora- their structure, mandate.тАЭ

GS Paper II 2024 ┬╖ Q19

15 marks ┬╖ 250 words International institutions

тАШTerrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security.тАЩ Evaluate the effectiveness of the United Nations Security CouncilтАЩs Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC) and its associated bodies in addressing and mitigating this threat at the international level.

Approach ┬╖ directive: тАЬevaluateтАЭ

What it asks ┬╖ Evaluate how far the UNSC's Counter-Terrorism Committee and related bodies (CTED, sanctions committees, UNOCT) have countered terrorism тАФ successes, shortcomings and reforms.

It asks 2 things тАФ answer each

  1. Set out the CTC and its associated bodies: mandate and architecture
  2. Evaluate their effectiveness against terrorism: achievements, shortcomings, and a verdict with reforms

Open with ┬╖ On 28 September 2001 the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1373 under Chapter VII and set up the Counter-Terrorism Committee.

Cover

  • Architecture (table): CTC with CTED (Resolution 1373, 2001); ISIL/Al-Qaida sanctions committee; 1540 Committee; UNOCT (GA Resolution 71/291, 2017).
  • Achievements: near-universal counter-terror laws and financing controls aligned with FATF; sanctions with asset freezes and travel bans; capacity building.
  • New threats: under India's chairship the CTC unanimously adopted the Delhi Declaration (October 2022) on drones, social media and crowdfunding.
  • No agreed definition: the draft CCIT, backed by India, under negotiation since a 1996 Ad Hoc Committee.
  • Selective listing: technical holds by permanent members; Masood Azhar listed only on 1 May 2019.
  • State-dependent enforcement, sponsorship and safe havens; due-process concerns; online radicalisation and crypto financing outpace rules.
  • Way forward: adopt the CCIT, end holds, fund CTED assistance, link FATF and regional bodies.

Close with ┬╖ The General Assembly's December 2024 call (Resolution 79/129) for a working group to finalise the CCIT, with impartial listings, would turn the CTC's framework into real deterrence.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2024, GS Paper II тАФ paper тЖЧ. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) тАФ UPSC publishes no model answers. ┬╖

Model answer┬╖ 308words ┬╖ Minimalist IAS

On 28 September 2001, after the 9/11 attacks, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1373 under Chapter VII, obliging every state to criminalise terrorism and its financing, and set up the Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC). Its record shows what global rules can do, and where politics stops them.

The CTC and its associated bodies

BodyBasisRole
CTC with its Executive Directorate (CTED)Resolution 1373 (2001)Monitors states; assesses gaps
ISIL and Al-Qaida Sanctions CommitteeSecurity Council sanctionsAsset freezes, travel bans
UN Office of Counter-TerrorismGA Resolution 71/291 (2017)Capacity building
  • The 1540 Committee adds a watch on weapons of mass destruction reaching non-state actors.

Effectiveness: achievements

  • Global legal floor: near-universal counter-terror laws and financing controls, aligned with FATF standards.
  • Sanctions that bite: listings freeze assets and restrict the travel of terrorists and their backers.
  • Capacity building: CTED assessments and UNOCT programmes help weaker states close gaps.
  • Adapting to technology: under India's chairship, the CTC unanimously adopted the Delhi Declaration (October 2022) on terrorist abuse of drones, social media and crowdfunding.

Effectiveness: shortcomings

  • No definition: the draft Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT), backed by India, has been negotiated since an Ad Hoc Committee was set up in 1996, without agreement.
  • Selective listing: 'technical holds' by permanent members delay designations; Masood Azhar was listed only on 1 May 2019.
  • State-dependent enforcement: state sponsorship, safe havens and weak capacity blunt the framework.
  • Due process: listings without fair hearing raise human-rights concerns.
  • Emerging gaps: lone actors, online radicalisation and crypto financing outpace the rules.

Way forward

  • Reforms: adopt the CCIT, end technical holds on listings, fund CTED's technical assistance, and link FATF and regional bodies more closely.

In December 2024 the General Assembly (Resolution 79/129) recommended a working group to finalise the CCIT. Closing that deal, and listing terrorists without political holds, would turn the CTC's framework into real deterrence.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) ┬╖ facts checked against official sources (how we verify) ┬╖ updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2024, Q19 тАФ minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2024/gs2/q19 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now ┬╖ 11 minutes for 250 words, by hand, as in the exam 11:00
Free ┬╖ 3 answers on us Write this answer тАФ get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 250 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on International institutions тЖТ

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free ┬╖ Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp тЖТ