GS Paper IV 2021 · Q1 (Section A)
2 parts · 10 marks and 150 words each Foundational values for civil service X-Ray · Core #1Q1(a) 10 marks · 150 words · answered on its own
Identify five ethical traits on which one can plot the performance of a civil servant. Justify their inclusion in the matrix.
Approach · directive: “identify; justify”
What it asks · Name five ethical traits on which a civil servant's performance can be plotted, and justify why each belongs in the matrix.
It asks 2 things — answer each
- Identify five ethical traits on which a civil servant's performance can be plotted
- Justify the inclusion of each trait in the matrix
Open with · An ethical performance matrix rates how results were achieved, not only what; output alone would rank the able but corrupt officer first. Five traits qualify: each sustains trust and leaves evidence in the record.
Cover
- A 2×2 table plots competence against integrity: the able but corrupt officer, top of an output-only ranking, is exposed.
- Integrity and moral courage: the IAS appraisal form already seeks comment on integrity, moral and intellectual too, and on courage to stand up for what is right.
- Impartiality: equal treatment of every citizen, plotted through speaking orders and reversals on appeal.
- Empathy: Article 46's 'special care' for the weaker sections, plotted through grievance-redress time.
- Accountability: RTI replies within thirty days and settled audit paras turn the other traits into evidence.
Close with · Kautilya tested ministers through allurements and posted each by the trait proved; a modern matrix applies that logic with open evidence, so character, not output alone, decides who handles power.
Add value (verified)
- The IAS PAR form substituted in 2019 asks the reporting officer to comment on 'ownership of responsibilities with courage to stand up for what is right', on the officer's integrity, and, in the pen picture, on the officer's attitude towards weaker sections.Amendment to AIS (PAR) Rules, 2007 (DoPT letter No. 11059/01/2016-AIS-III; notification G.S.R. 519(E), 23 July 2019), with the new PAR Form and guidelines for IAS officers — copy on the website of the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Puducherry ↗“courage to stand up for what is right (iii) Innovativeness (iv) Track record of delivery (v) Ability to lead a team with coordination and collaboration 9. Integrity Please comment on the integrity of the officer: 10. Pen picture by Reporting Officer. Please comment (in about 50 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strengths and lesser strengths and his attitude towards weaker sections.”
- The PAR guidelines tell the reporting authority that remarks on integrity need not be limited to financial integrity; they may also cover the officer's moral and intellectual integrity.Amendment to AIS (PAR) Rules, 2007 (DoPT letter No. 11059/01/2016-AIS-III; notification G.S.R. 519(E), 23 July 2019), with the new PAR Form and guidelines for IAS officers — copy on the website of the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Puducherry ↗“In recording remarks with regard to integrity, he/she need not limit him/herself only to matters relating to financial integrity but could also take into account the moral and intellectual integrity of the officer reported upon.”
- Kautilya's Arthashastra (Book I) tested ministers through allurements and posted each by the trait proved: those pure under religious allurement to the courts, those pure under monetary allurement to revenue collection.Kautilya's Arthashastra, Book I (trans. R. Shamasastry, 1915) — text hosted by Prof. Frances W. Pritchett (Columbia University) ↗“Of these tried ministers, those whose character has been tested under religious allurements shall be employed in civil and criminal courts ( dharmasthanyakantaka sodhaneshu ); those whose purity has been tested under monetary allurements shall be employed in the work of a revenue collector and chamberlain”
Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2021, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·
Model answer· 224words · Minimalist IAS
An ethical performance matrix rates a civil servant on how results were achieved, not only what; output alone would rank the able but corrupt officer first. Five traits qualify: each sustains trust and leaves evidence in the record.
| Officer | High integrity | Low integrity |
|---|---|---|
| High competence | Asset: reward | Danger: watch closely |
Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.
Q1(b) 10 marks · 150 words · answered on its own
Identify ten essential values that are needed to be an effective public servant. Describe the ways and means to prevent non-ethical behaviour in the public servants.
Approach · directive: “identify; describe”
What it asks · List ten essential values of an effective public servant, then describe practical ways and means to prevent non-ethical behaviour.
It asks 2 things — answer each
- Identify ten essential values needed to be an effective public servant
- Describe the ways and means to prevent non-ethical behaviour in public servants
Open with · Ambedkar warned the Constituent Assembly in 1949 that even a good Constitution turns out bad if those who work it are a bad lot; integrity in office needs values within and safeguards without.
Cover
- A table groups the ten values: honest (integrity, objectivity, impartiality, non-partisanship), humane (dedication, empathy, compassion, tolerance), answerable (accountability, transparency).
- Codify and disclose: conduct rules, annual asset declarations and citizen's charters turn ideals into checkable standards.
- Design out temptation: faceless income-tax assessment (2020) ends the need for direct contact between taxpayer and officer.
- Insulate and record: T.S.R. Subramanian (2013) directed minimum tenure and recorded instructions, as oral directions give room for favoritism and corruption.
- Watch, punish, protect: vigilance, RTI, social audit, Lokpal and Lokayuktas, certain penalties, whistle-blower protection and case-based training.
Close with · Together these serve SDG target 16.5, to substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms, by making honesty the easier path.
Add value (verified)
- Dr B.R. Ambedkar told the Constituent Assembly (25 November 1949) that however good a Constitution may be, it is sure to turn out bad if those called to work it are a bad lot.Constituent Assembly Debates, 25 November 1949 (Dr B.R. Ambedkar) — constitutionofindia.net (CLPR) ↗“however good a Constitution may be, it is sure to turn out bad because those who are called to work it, happen to be a bad lot.”
- Faceless Assessment came into force on 13 August 2020 under the 'Transparent Taxation - Honouring the Honest' platform: there is no need for direct contact between the taxpayer and the Income Tax Officer in scrutiny, notice, survey or assessment (PIB).Prime Minister launches platform for 'Transparent Taxation - Honouring the Honest' — PIB, 13 August 2020 ↗“Referring to the Faceless system he said there is no need for a direct contact between the Taxpayer and the Income Tax Officer in all matters of scrutiny, notice, survey or assessment.”
- T.S.R. Subramanian v Union of India (Supreme Court, 31 October 2013): oral directions defeat the RTI Act and give room for favoritism and corruption; the Court directed States and UTs to issue directions like Rule 3(3) of the AIS (Conduct) Rules on recording instructions.T.S.R. Subramanian & Ors vs Union of India & Ors, Supreme Court, 31 October 2013 — Indian Kanoon ↗“The practice of giving oral directions/instructions by the administrative superiors, political executive etc. would defeat the object and purpose of RTI Act and would give room for favoritism and corruption. 35. We, therefore, direct all the State Governments and Union Territories to issue directions like Rule 3(3) of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968”
- In the same judgment the Court directed the Union, States and UTs to secure a minimum tenure of service for civil servants within three months.T.S.R. Subramanian & Ors vs Union of India & Ors, Supreme Court, 31 October 2013 — Indian Kanoon ↗“We, therefore, direct the Union State Governments and Union Territories to issue appropriate directions to secure providing of minimum tenure of service to various civil servants, within a period of three months.”
- SDG target 16.5: substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms.Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions — targets and indicators, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (sdgs.un.org) ↗“Target 16.5 Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms”
Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2021, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·
Model answer· 220words · Minimalist IAS
Ambedkar warned the Constituent Assembly in 1949 that even a good Constitution turns out bad if 'those who are called to work it, happen to be a bad lot'. Integrity in office needs values within and safeguards without.
Ten essential values of an effective public servant
| Cluster | Values | Why needed |
|---|---|---|
| Honest | Integrity, objectivity, impartiality, non-partisanship | Trusted decisions |
| Humane | Dedication to service, empathy, compassion, tolerance | Reaching the weakest |
| Answerable | Accountability, transparency | Power under scrutiny |
The full answer goes on to cover
- Ways and means to prevent non-ethical behaviour
Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.







