Minimalist IAS
2021 GS Paper IV

UPSC CSE (Main) 2021 · GS Paper IV · Question 5

(a) “Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right…

Syllabus line: Ethics in public administration — “Public/Civil service values and Ethics in Public administration: Status and problems; ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions; laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance; accountability and ethical governance; strengthening of ethical and moral values in governance; ethical issues in international relations and funding; corporate governance.”

GS Paper IV 2021 · Q5 (Section A)

10 marks · 150 words Ethics in public administration

(a) “Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation.” Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society. (b) Should impartial and being non-partisan be considered as indispensable qualities to make a successful civil servant? Discuss with illustrations.

Approach · directive: “examine / discuss”

What it asks · (a) Examine the ethical duties a democratic, open society breaches by returning refugees to danger; (b) discuss with illustrations whether impartiality and non-partisanship are indispensable for a successful civil servant.

The question has 2 parts — answer each

  1. (a) Examine the ethical dimensions a democratic, open society violates when it returns refugees to persecution
  2. (b) Discuss, with illustrations, whether impartiality and non-partisanship are indispensable for a successful civil servant

Open with · Kant held that states must shelter non-citizens in an emergency; non-refoulement (Article 33, 1951 Convention) makes the duty law, and neutrality tests whether civil servants serve all alike.

Cover

  • (a) Principle: non-refoulement, in Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention and widely seen as customary law, bars return to danger to life or freedom.
  • (a) Violated: dignity and the right to life, compassion, justice and non-discrimination, and the hypocrisy of an open democracy that claims to protect rights.
  • (a) State concerns: security, resource pressure, demographic change and illegal entry are real, but screening and burden-sharing can manage them without returning people to persecution.
  • (a) India is not a party to the Convention, but the Supreme Court has held Article 21 protects non-citizens too (NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh, 1996, on the Chakma refugees).
  • (b) Yes, indispensable: impartiality ensures equal treatment and merit-based decisions; non-partisanship keeps the permanent executive neutral and trusted by every government and citizen.
  • (b) Illustrations: election officers running free and fair polls, a district officer allocating relief without favour, a civil servant loyally implementing a new government's policy.
  • (b) Limits: impartiality is not indifference; officers must still serve the weaker sections through lawful positive discrimination and give honest advice without fear or favour.
  • Anchors: Kant's duty to shelter in emergencies; UDHR Article 14; Patel on an independent all-India service; CCS rules on political neutrality and impartiality.

Close with · A democracy proves its values at the margin: in protecting the stranger it could turn away, and in civil servants serving citizens whose politics they do not share.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2021, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 393 words (UPSC limit 150) · Minimalist IAS

Kant's cosmopolitan right held that in an emergency, such as a shipwreck, states must give non-citizens temporary shelter, an idea read as the basis of a duty to accept refugees. Non-refoulement, in Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention, turns that duty into law.

(a) Ethical dimensions violated when a democracy returns refugees to persecution

  • Life and dignity: return to persecution makes the state a link in foreseeable harm; Article 14 of the UDHR recognises the right "to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution".
  • Universality of rights: an open society claims rights for persons, not only citizens. India is not a party to the 1951 Convention, yet in NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh (1996) the Supreme Court held that Article 21 protects the Chakma refugees, and Article 51(c) asks the State to respect international law.
  • Justice: choosing whom to shelter by religion, race or usefulness turns compassion into patronage.
  • Integrity: professing openness while pushing people back is hypocrisy, a gap between creed and conduct.
  • Compassion: the refugee at the border is the weakest person the state will ever meet.
  • Legitimate concerns: security, resource pressure and illegal entry are real, but they justify screening, registration and burden-sharing, not return to danger.

(b) Are impartiality and non-partisanship indispensable for a successful civil servant?

  • Meaning: impartiality is deciding on merit without favour; non-partisanship is serving any elected government without political alignment. The CCS (Conduct) Rules for central civil servants require "political neutrality" and "merit, fairness and impartiality".
  • Founders' view: Sardar Patel told the Constituent Assembly that India would not stay united without an all-India service "which has the independence to speak out its mind".
  • Why indispensable: ministers trust a service that will serve the next government as loyally as this one; citizens trust a counter that never asks whom they voted for. Efficiency without neutrality lacks legitimacy.
QualityIllustrationLapse it prevents
ImpartialityFlood relief by damage, not partyPatronage
Non-partisanshipObjects on file, then implementsPoliticised service
Electoral neutralityA poll the loser acceptsDistrust of elections
  • Not indifference: lawful positive discrimination for weaker sections, frank advice and refusal of unlawful orders are duties, not lapses.

A democracy proves its values at the margin: in how it treats the stranger it could easily turn away, and in whether its civil servants serve the citizen whose politics they do not share.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Ethics in public administration →