Minimalist IAS
2018 GS Paper IV

UPSC CSE (Main) 2018 · GS Paper IV · Question 9

Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control?

Syllabus line: Case studies — “Case Studies on above issues.”

GS Paper IV 2018 · Q9 (Section B)

20 marks · 250 words Case studies

It is a State where prohibition is in force. You are recently appointed as the Superintendent of Police of a district notorious for illicit distillation of liquor. The illicit liquor leads to many deaths, reported and unreported, and causes a major problem for the district authorities.

The approach till now had been to view it as a law and order problem and tackle it accordingly. Raids, arrests, police cases, criminal trials – all these had only limited impact. The problem remains as serious as ever.

Your inspections show that the parts of the district where the distillation flourishes are economically, industrially and educationally backward. Agriculture is badly affected by poor irrigation facilities. Frequent clashes among communities gave boost to illicit distillation. No major initiatives had taken place in the past either from the government’s side or from social organizations to improve the lot of the people.

Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control?

Approach · directive: “which new approach”

What it asks · Propose a new approach beyond policing to control illicit distillation, combining enforcement, health, development and community partnership.

Open with · Raids and arrests treat the symptom; the case shows a social and economic problem behind the crime, so the Superintendent of Police must lead a district-wide, multi-agency response.

Cover

  • Diagnose the root causes: poverty, joblessness, poor irrigation and farm income, low education, community clashes and demand for cheap liquor; policing alone treats symptoms.
  • Smart enforcement: intelligence-led action against kingpins, suppliers of raw material and transporters, and against corrupt police and excise staff; forensic testing for methanol; asset seizure; a joint task force with the excise department.
  • Health response: hospitals ready with treatment protocols for methanol poisoning, prompt reporting of deaths, and compensation for victims' families.
  • Development: ask the district administration to converge schemes on livelihoods, irrigation, skills, self-help groups and schooling in the affected blocks, with NGO and CSR support.
  • Community partnership: panchayats, women's groups, youth and religious leaders for awareness and de-addiction; reconciliation forums to reduce clashes; community policing with protected informers.
  • Policy feedback: tell the government what enforcement shows about prohibition's reach and gaps, and suggest a review, while implementing the law as it stands.
  • Monitor: a district coordination committee with clear indicators such as deaths, raids, livelihoods and school enrolment, reviewed regularly.

Close with · Treat illicit liquor as a social and economic problem as well as a crime: enforce firmly against suppliers, and invest in livelihoods, health and community policing so that citizens become partners in prohibition.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2018, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 375 words (UPSC limit 250) · Minimalist IAS

Article 47 makes prohibition a constitutional aim tied to public health, but raids and arrests have treated illicit distillation as crime alone. The district's poverty, failing farms and community clashes show a social economy behind the still, which policing alone cannot dismantle.

Stakeholders

  • Victims' families; distillers and their dependants; communities in conflict; women and youth; police and excise staff; the district administration; and the State.

Why the old approach failed

  • It punished the last link, the poor distiller, while poverty, joblessness, poor irrigation, low education and demand for cheap liquor kept replacing him; each raid displaced the trade without removing its cause.

The new approach

Controlling illicit liquor

Smart enforcementSaving livesLivelihoodsCommunity policingReconciliationPolicy feedback
  • Smart enforcement: intelligence-led action against kingpins, raw-material suppliers and transporters, not mass arrests of the poor; forensic testing for methanol; asset seizure; strict action against colluding staff.
  • Save lives first: methanol-poisoning protocols in every hospital, prompt reporting of deaths, compensation for victims' families and de-addiction services.
  • Development convergence: persuade the District Magistrate to focus livelihood, irrigation, skills, self-help group and schooling schemes on the affected blocks, with NGO and CSR support, and offer alternative work to distilling families.
  • Community policing: the 2nd ARC's Public Order report cites success stories such as Andhra Pradesh's Maithri and the Mohalla Committees of Bhiwandi; enlist panchayats, women's groups, youth and faith leaders for awareness and reporting, with protected informers.
  • Reconciliation: set up peace committees with fair representation of women, which the Home Ministry's communal harmony guidelines say helps contain riots, to end the clashes that feed the trade.
  • Social mobilisation: the Telugu daily Eenadu reached the countryside by joining the anti-arrack movement of the mid-1980s, which showed that public campaigns reach villages where raids cannot.
  • Feedback and monitoring: implement the law as it stands, but report honestly on prohibition's reach; track deaths, raids, livelihoods and school enrolment in a district coordination committee.

Why this is the ethical choice

  • It uses force proportionately, protects life, and treats the poor as citizens to be lifted, not criminals to be counted.

Illicit liquor is a crime with social roots: strike at those who profit, invest in livelihoods and health, and live by the 2nd ARC's maxim that a citizen is "a policeman without uniform".

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Case studies →