Minimalist IAS
CSAT 2019 paper

UPSC CSE CSAT 2019 · Paper II (CSAT) · Question 32 · Logical & analytical reasoning

किसी विद्यालय में, 60% विद्यार्थी क्रिकेट खेलते हैं । जो विद्यार्थी क्रिकेट नहीं खेलता है, वह…

UPSC Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 2019, General Studies Paper II (CSAT), Question 32 — Logical & analytical reasoning.

CSAT 2019 · Q32

Logical & analytical reasoning Medium

किसी विद्यालय में, 60% विद्यार्थी क्रिकेट खेलते हैं । जो विद्यार्थी क्रिकेट नहीं खेलता है, वह फुटबाल खेलता है । हर फुटबाल खिलाड़ी के पास एक दोपहिया वाहन है । उपर्युक्त आँकड़ों से निम्नलिखित में से कौन-से निष्कर्ष नहीं निकाले जा सकते हैं ?

  1. 1.60% विद्यार्थियों के पास दोपहिया वाहन नहीं है ।
  2. 2.किसी भी क्रिकेट खिलाड़ी के पास दोपहिया वाहन नहीं है ।
  3. 3.क्रिकेट खिलाड़ी फुटबाल नहीं खेलते हैं ।

नीचे दिए गए कूट का प्रयोग कर सही उत्तर चुनिए :

Read this question in English

In a school, 60% students play cricket. A student who does not play cricket, plays football. Every football player has got a two-wheeler. Which of the following conclusions cannot be drawn from the above data?

1. 60% of the students do not have two-wheelers.

2. No cricketer has a two-wheeler.

3. Cricket players do not play football.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

(a) 1 and 2 only · (b) 2 and 3 only · (c) 1 and 3 only · (d) 1, 2 and 3

उत्तर और व्याख्या · explanation in English

Answer: (d) 1, 2 और 3

The data fixes only the 40% who do not play cricket: they all play football and so all own two-wheelers. Nothing is said about whether cricketers own two-wheelers or also play football, so none of the three conclusions can be drawn.

  1. Non-cricketers = 40%; all of them play football, so all of them have two-wheelers.
  2. The 60% cricketers are not described: some may own two-wheelers, some may also play football.
  3. Conclusions 1 and 2 need every cricketer to be without a two-wheeler — not given.
  4. Conclusion 3 needs cricketers to avoid football — not given; the rule runs only from 'not cricket' to 'football'.
  5. So 1, 2 and 3 all cannot be drawn.
  • ✗ 1. Cannot be drawn: at most 60% lack two-wheelers; fewer do if any cricketer owns one.
  • ✗ 2. Cannot be drawn: cricketers' vehicles are never mentioned.
  • ✗ 3. Cannot be drawn: a cricketer may also play football; the data does not forbid it.

Remember · 'Whoever is not A does B' says nothing about the members of A; claims about that group cannot be drawn.

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2019, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·

Cite this question: UPSC CSE CSAT 2019, Q32 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/csat/2019/q32

In the UPSC syllabus: Logical & analytical reasoning › Syllogisms & statement–conclusion See it and tick it covered →

Timed · 35 minutes Take CSAT Logical & analytical reasoning · Set 2 as a test This question is in it — with UPSC's marking and an instant score. Start the set

More on Logical & analytical reasoning

All Logical & analytical reasoning questions →