On the basis of the passage given above, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Sustainable production of India’s cereal food grains is impossible without the diversity of pollinating animals.
- 2.Monoculture of horticultural crops hampers the survival of insects.
- 3.Pollinators become scarce in cultivated areas devoid of natural vegetation.
- 4.Diversity in insects induces diversity of plants.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 3 and 4 only
The passage ties plants and pollinators together — the loss of either hurts both — and says pollination needs refuges of natural vegetation. That supports 3 and 4; India's cereals and monoculture are topics the passage never raises.
- ✗ 1. The passage speaks of crops in general ('at least one-third'), not India's cereals, and 'impossible' is far stronger than anything it says.
- ✗ 2. Monoculture and horticulture are not mentioned; this brings in a new subject.
- ✓ 3. 'Effective pollination requires resources, such as refuges of pristine natural vegetation' — where such vegetation is missing, pollinators lose their support.
- ✓ 4. Pollination rests on 'intricate relationships between plants and animals', and the loss of either affects both; so a richer variety of insect pollinators sustains a richer variety of plants.
Remember · An assumption must rest on a line of the passage; reject statements that add a new subject or an absolute word like 'impossible'.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2021, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·