Minimalist IAS
Science & technology

Prelims · Science & technology · 30 questions

Biotechnology & genetics

Every UPSC Prelims question on this topic, 2016–2026, newest first. Tap an option to check yourself; the answer and explanation open below it.

Biotechnology & genetics questions per year: 2016: 1, 2017: 2, 2018: 1, 2019: 3, 2020: 2, 2021: 3, 2022: 1, 2023: 2, 2024: 0, 2025: 2, 2026: 2 Asked in 10 of 11 years · most in 2021 (3)

UPSC syllabus: “General Science.” See the full syllabus →

In the context of vaccines manufactured to prevent COVID-19 pandemic, consider the following statements:

  1. 1.The Serum Institute of India produced COVID-19 vaccine named Covishield using mRNA platform.
  2. 2.Sputnik V vaccine is manufactured using vector based platform.
  3. 3.COVAXIN is an inactivated pathogen based vaccine.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) 2 and 3 only

Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Sputnik V is a vector vaccine and COVAXIN is a whole-virus inactivated vaccine. Statement 1 is wrong because Covishield, made by the Serum Institute of India, is a viral-vector vaccine (adenovirus carrier), not an mRNA vaccine.

  • ✗ 1. Covishield is the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine produced in India by the Serum Institute. It uses a weakened chimpanzee adenovirus as a carrier, so it is a viral-vector vaccine. No mRNA is involved.
  • ✓ 2. Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac) from Russia's Gamaleya Institute is a combined vector vaccine given in two components.
  • ✓ 3. COVAXIN by Bharat Biotech, developed with ICMR-NIV, uses a whole-virion inactivated Vero-cell platform: dead virus that cannot infect but still trains the immune system.

Remember · Covishield and Sputnik V: viral-vector vaccines. COVAXIN: inactivated whole virus. ZyCoV-D: DNA. mRNA is the Pfizer and Moderna type.

Sources

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper I (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

Consider the following statements:

DNA Barcoding can be a tool to:

  1. 1.assess the age of a plant or animal.
  2. 2.distinguish among species that look alike.
  3. 3.identify undesirable animal or plant materials in processed foods.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) 2 and 3

DNA barcoding identifies which species a sample belongs to by reading a short, standard piece of DNA. So it can tell apart look-alike (cryptic) species and can spot unwanted or undeclared species in processed food, but it does not tell the age of an organism.

  • ✗ 1. A DNA barcode is a short standardised DNA marker used for detection and identification of species. It says what the organism is, not how old it is.
  • ✓ 2. Barcodes can separate cryptic species, which look alike outwardly; a DNA mini-barcode with next-generation sequencing has been used to detect such species even in mixed seafood.
  • ✓ 3. Processed foods are more likely to be substituted or adulterated with undeclared species, and DNA barcoding is used to check meat, poultry and fish products for such species.

Remember · DNA barcoding = species identification from a short standard DNA sequence (COI in animals). Uses: telling look-alike (cryptic) species apart and checking foods for undeclared species. Not for age.

Sources

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper I (2022, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify). Permalink ·

The same topic in Mains