Minimalist IAS
Prelims 2025 paper

UPSC CSE Prelims 2025 · Question 64 · Climate change & agreements

The World Bank warned that India could become one of the first places where wet-bulb temperatures…

Prelims 2025 · Q64

Climate change & agreements Medium

The World Bank warned that India could become one of the first places where wet-bulb temperatures routinely exceed 35 °C. Which of the following statements best reflect(s) the implication of the above-said report?

  1. I.Peninsular India will most likely suffer from flooding, tropical cyclones and droughts.
  2. II.The survival of animals including humans will be affected as shedding of their body heat through perspiration becomes difficult.

Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Both I and II

UPSC's official answer: (c) · the answer UPSC accepted, and the one that counts in the exam

What we believe is right: (b)

  • Statement II is the direct implication. Wet-bulb temperature combines heat and humidity; 'as the wet-bulb temperature approaches your core temperature, you lose the ability to cool down' (NASA), and the World Bank treats 35 °C as the point where heat waves 'break the human survivability limit'.
  • Statement I is not an implication of that warning. The World Bank report (Climate Investment Opportunities in India's Cooling Sector, 2022) projects the 35 °C threshold for 'the Chota Nagpur Plateau and North-Eastern India', and nowhere mentions floods, tropical cyclones, droughts or peninsular India.
  • A warning about heat stress does not imply a forecast of flooding and cyclones for a different region, so a strict reading accepts II only: (b).
  • UPSC's key accepts both, presumably reading the warning as one face of climate change over India whose other faces are floods, cyclones and drought.

UPSC's key accepts both statements; the report itself supports only II, giving (b). In the exam, when the stem says 'best reflect(s) the implication' and 'Both' is offered, UPSC has accepted a broad climate-impact statement alongside the direct one; but know what the report actually says.

This box is Minimalist IAS's analysis, with its sources; it does not change UPSC's answer.

UPSC's key accepts both statements. Statement II is the direct implication: wet-bulb temperature combines heat and humidity, and as it nears the body's core temperature sweat can no longer evaporate fast enough to shed heat, so survival itself is threatened. Statement I is counted as the wider implication: the key reads the warning as a sign of a climate system under stress over India, whose other faces are flooding, tropical cyclones and drought.

  • ✓ I UPSC's key counts this as an implication. The report's warning of routine 35 °C wet-bulb readings signals a warmer, moister atmosphere over India; the key reads the hazards that go with such warming — heavier rain and flooding, stronger cyclones on the peninsula's coasts, longer dry spells — as part of what the warning implies.
  • ✓ II Wet-bulb temperature combines heat and humidity. Near the body's core temperature, sweat cannot evaporate enough to cool the body (NASA), and the World Bank treats 35 °C as that survivability threshold.

Remember · Wet-bulb temperature combines heat and humidity. Near 35 °C sweat cannot cool the body, so survival is at risk; the World Bank flagged India as an early case.

Sources

Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper I (2025, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify). ·

More on Climate change & agreements

All Climate change & agreements questions →

Same topic in the Mains syllabus