Minimalist IAS
2022 GS Paper IV

UPSC CSE (Main) 2022 · GS Paper IV · Question 5

(a) Russia and Ukraine war has been going on for the last seven months. Different countries have taken…

Syllabus line: Ethics in public administration — “Public/Civil service values and Ethics in Public administration: Status and problems; ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions; laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance; accountability and ethical governance; strengthening of ethical and moral values in governance; ethical issues in international relations and funding; corporate governance.”

GS Paper IV 2022 · Q5 (Section A)

10 marks · 150 words Ethics in public administration

(a) Russia and Ukraine war has been going on for the last seven months. Different countries have taken independent stands and actions keeping in view their own national interests. We are all aware that war has its own impact on the different aspects of society, including human tragedy. What are those ethical issues that are crucial to be considered while launching the war and its continuation so far? Illustrate with justification the ethical issues involved in the given state of affair. (b) Write short notes on the following in 30 words each : (i) Constitutional morality (ii) Conflict of interest (iii) Probity in public life (iv) Challenges of digitalization (v) Devotion to duty

Approach · directive: “what / illustrate / write short notes”

What it asks · (a) Identify the ethical issues in launching and continuing a war, using the Russia-Ukraine conflict; (b) write five short notes of about 30 words each on the given concepts.

The question has 2 parts — answer each

  1. (a) Identify the ethical issues crucial to launching a war and to its continuation, and illustrate them with justification from the Russia-Ukraine war
  2. (b) Write short notes of about 30 words each on: constitutional morality; conflict of interest; probity in public life; challenges of digitalization; devotion to duty

Open with · Ashoka's remorse after Kalinga: war raises two ethical questions, whether it is right to fight and whether it is right to go on.

Cover

  • (a) Just cause and last resort: sovereignty and territorial integrity (UN Charter, Article 2(4)) against security claims, and whether diplomacy was exhausted.
  • (a) Proportionality and protection of civilians: attacks on homes, hospitals and infrastructure, refugees and deaths, and global food and energy shortages.
  • (a) National interest versus morality: states choose sides by interest, and India's interest-based stand with repeated appeals for dialogue shows the tension.
  • (a) Continuation: the duty to seek a ceasefire, accountability for war crimes, and the ethics of arms supply and sanctions.
  • (b) Constitutional morality: fidelity to constitutional values and processes; conflict of interest: private interest clashing with public duty; probity: honesty and integrity in public life.
  • (b) Challenges of digitalization: divide, privacy and cyber risk; devotion to duty: dedicated service beyond compulsion. Give each a definition, an example and a value in about 30 words.

Close with · Ashoka turned to dhamma after the killing; states must weigh interest against suffering and keep the path to peace open before it.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2022, GS Paper IV — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 1 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 407 words (UPSC limit 150) · Minimalist IAS

Ashoka's edict on Kalinga records that "a hundred thousand were killed" and speaks of "the repentance" of the king. The Russia-Ukraine war, seven months old when this question was set, asks the same two things: was it right to fight, and is it right to go on?

(a) Ethical issues in launching and continuing the war

StageEthical testThe issue here
LaunchJust cause, last resortForce against a sovereign state
ConductSpare civiliansHomes, hospitals, power grids hit
ContinuationProportionality, duty to seek peaceSuffering grows, aims recede
  • Legality and just cause: Article 2(4) of the UN Charter bars force against any state's territorial integrity; Article 51 allows self-defence "if an armed attack occurs". Security anxieties are not such an attack.
  • Last resort: just war theory asks that there be "no other less harmful way"; force used while diplomacy remained open fails it.
  • Discrimination: belligerents must "distinguish between military objectives and civilians"; strikes on homes and mass displacement breach it.
  • Harm to the distant poor: costlier grain and fuel hurt countries far from the front.
  • Interest versus morality: states chose sides by energy needs and alliances, showing realism's pull against universal ethics.
  • Duty to stop: war crimes need independent probes; prolonging a war whose aims recede multiplies suffering, so ceasefire and talks are a moral duty.

(b) Short notes

  • Constitutional morality: fidelity to the Constitution's values and processes above personal or popular morality. Ambedkar warned that it "is not a natural sentiment. It has to be cultivated."
  • Conflict of interest: a situation where an official's private interest, of money, family or friendship, could sway a public decision, as when a relative bids in a tender one evaluates. Remedy: disclosure and recusal.
  • Probity in public life: uprightness beyond mere legality: acting only for the public good, declaring assets, refusing gifts and accounting openly for every decision.
  • Challenges of digitalization: a deep divide (internet in only 14.9% of rural households, NSS 2017-18), authentication failures, privacy loss, cyber-fraud and algorithmic bias; inclusive design and data protection are the answer.
  • Devotion to duty: wholehearted commitment beyond compulsion: diligence and service under hardship, as health workers showed in COVID-19. The CCS (Conduct) Rules require every government servant to "maintain devotion to duty".

Ashoka turned from conquest to dhamma only after the killing. The ethical test for states today is to make that turn before it: to weigh national interest against human suffering, and to keep the path to peace open.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Ethics in public administration →