Which of the following conclusions is/are valid?
- 1.Though SARS-CoV-2 and HMPV are similar viruses with somewhat different epidemiology, the former became a pandemic because it was novel and people had not been exposed to it in the past.
- 2.The two viruses have fundamentally different impacts on human populations and should not therefore be dealt with in a similar manner.
Select the answer using the code given below.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 2 only
The passage stresses that the two viruses are very different in family, epidemiology, severity and the people they affect, which supports not treating them alike. Statement 1 calls them 'similar viruses' and brings in a pandemic the passage never mentions.
- ✗ 1. The passage says they belong to 'two very different virus families with fundamentally different characteristics and epidemiology' — not 'similar viruses with somewhat different epidemiology'. It also says nothing about a pandemic.
- ✓ 2. Different severity, different long-term effects and non-overlapping affected groups add up to different impacts, which is the passage's reason for not equating HMPV with SARS-CoV-2.
Remember · Reject a statement that contradicts the passage's core contrast, even if its second half sounds reasonable.
Question and answer: UPSC's provisional GS Paper II (2026, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·