With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Biotechnology regulation is an evolving process.
- 2.Participation of people is needed in policy decisions regarding biotechnology regulation.
- 3.Biotechnology regulation should take into account socio-economic aspects in decision-making.
- 4.Wider involvement of political executive in biotechnology regulation improves its effectiveness in dealing with the country’s trade policies and international obligations.
Which of the above assumptions are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only
The passage says regulation cannot be framed only for today's single-trait GM crops because multi-trait crops will be the norm — so regulation must keep evolving (1) — and it asks for a comprehensive look that includes socio-economic impacts (3). Public participation and the political executive are never mentioned.
- ✓ 1. Regulation 'cannot be understood solely in the context of the current generation of GM crops' because future crops will differ — it has to keep changing with the technology.
- ✗ 2. The passage does not mention public participation in policy decisions.
- ✓ 3. It asks for a comprehensive look 'including socio-economic impacts'.
- ✗ 4. The passage links domestic regulation to trade policy and treaties, but says nothing about the political executive or what improves effectiveness.
Remember · Accept an assumption only when a phrase of the passage supports it; reject statements that bring in new actors such as 'people' or 'political executive'.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2020, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·