On the basis of the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Synthetic pesticides should never be used in modern agriculture.
- 2.One of the aims of sustainable agriculture is to ensure minimal ecological imbalance.
- 3.Botanical pesticides are more effective as compared to synthetic pesticides.
Which of the assumptions given above is/are correct?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 2 only
The passage recommends botanical pesticides as a 'practical sustainable alternative' because they avoid the ecological imbalance caused by synthetic ones, so it assumes that sustainable farming aims at minimal ecological imbalance. It neither bans synthetic pesticides outright nor claims botanicals control pests better.
- ✗ 1. 'Never' is too strong; the passage criticises indiscriminate use and offers an alternative, but does not call for a total ban.
- ✓ 2. Botanicals count as a sustainable alternative because synthetics 'cause ecological imbalance' — this only makes sense if sustainability means limiting such imbalance.
- ✗ 3. Botanicals are described as safer and biodegradable, not as more effective at controlling pests.
Remember · Separate 'safer' from 'more effective', and 'should reduce' from 'should never' — assumptions that harden the passage's claims are invalid.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2017, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·