Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2024 GS Paper III

UPSC CSE (Main) 2024 · GS Paper III · Question 5

What is the present world scenario of intellectual property rights with respect to life materials? Although,…

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024, General Studies Paper III (GS 3), Question 5 — 10 marks, 150 words.

Syllabus line: IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR — “Awareness in the fields of IT, Space, Computers, robotics, nano-technology, bio-technology and issues relating to intellectual property rights.”

GS Paper III 2024 · Q5

10 marks · 150 words IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR

What is the present world scenario of intellectual property rights with respect to life materials? Although, India is second in the world to file patents, still only a few have been commercialized. Explain the reasons behind this less commercialization.

Approach · directive: “what / explain”

What it asks · Outline the global regime on patenting life forms and genetic material, then explain why India's growing patent filings rarely become products.

It asks 2 things — answer each

  1. What: the present world scenario of IPR over life materials — patentability, TRIPS flexibilities, access and benefit-sharing
  2. Explain why India's patents are rarely commercialised despite rising filings

Open with · History: since Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980) allowed a US patent on a modified bacterium, patents on genes, micro-organisms and plant varieties have spread worldwide and been contested.

Cover

  • TRIPS Article 27.3(b): members may exclude plants and animals other than micro-organisms, but must protect plant varieties by patents or a sui generis system.
  • India: Patents Act Section 3(j) excludes plants, animals and seeds; PPV&FR Act 2001; Biological Diversity Act 2002.
  • Access and benefit-sharing: CBD, Nagoya Protocol; the 2024 WIPO treaty makes disclosure of origin of genetic resources and traditional knowledge mandatory.
  • Filing without a market: 1,03,057 patents granted in 2023-24 (PIB); many academic filings for rankings; WIPO 2024 ranks India sixth in filings, fastest-growing.
  • Weak lab-to-market bridge: few technology-transfer offices, little proof-of-concept or venture funding, thin industry links.
  • Ecosystem gaps: low private R&D, pendency, weak IP valuation and financing, litigation risk.

Close with · India must count licences, not patents — translational funds, tech-transfer offices, industry-linked research and faster, predictable IP processes — so that Atmanirbhar Bharat in biotechnology rests on patents that reach the market.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2024, GS Paper III — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 229words · Minimalist IAS

Since Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980) allowed a US patent on a modified bacterium, patents on genes, micro-organisms and plant varieties have spread, contested on ethical and equity grounds.

World scenario on life materials

  • TRIPS floor: Article 27.3(b) lets members exclude plants and animals 'other than micro-organisms' but requires plant-variety protection, by patents or a sui generis system.
  • Divergence: the US and Europe patent biotechnology inventions more readily; India's Section 3(j) bars plants, animals and seeds, with the PPV&FR Act 2001 and Biological Diversity Act 2002 covering breeders, farmers and access.
  • Benefit-sharing turn: the CBD, Nagoya Protocol and WIPO Treaty (2024), which mandates disclosure of the origin of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge in patent applications, aim to curb biopiracy.

Why few patents are commercialised

  • Filing without a market: WIPO 2024 places India sixth, not second, in patent applications (64,480 in 2023), yet fastest-growing in the top 20; 1,03,057 patents were granted in 2023-24 (PIB), many filed by academia for rankings, not a buyer.
  • Weak lab-to-market bridge: few technology-transfer offices, little proof-of-concept funding, thin industry links.
  • Ecosystem gaps: low private R&D, examination pendency, weak IP financing, litigation risk.
Lab inventionpatent for appraisalno proof-of-concept fundingno licenseepatent lapses
  1. Lab invention
  2. patent for appraisal
  3. no proof-of-concept funding
  4. no licensee
  5. patent lapses

India must count licences, not patents — translational funds, tech-transfer offices, industry-linked research, faster IP processes — so Atmanirbhar Bharat in biotechnology rests on patents that reach the market.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-3 2024, Q5 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2024/gs3/q5 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 150 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 150 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →