Minimalist IAS
2019 GS Paper III

UPSC CSE (Main) 2019 · GS Paper III · Question 13

What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make food grain distribution system more effective?

Syllabus line: Farm subsidies, MSP, PDS & food security — “Issues related to direct and indirect farm subsidies and minimum support prices; Public Distribution System- objectives, functioning, limitations, revamping; issues of buffer stocks and food security; Technology missions; economics of animal-rearing.”

GS Paper III 2019 · Q13

15 marks · 250 words Farm subsidies, MSP, PDS & food security

What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make food grain distribution system more effective?

Approach · directive: “what”

What it asks · List the reforms made to the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) to improve its reach, targeting and transparency, and note how far they have made it effective.

The question has 2 parts — answer each

  1. List the reformative steps taken to make food grain distribution more effective: legal entitlement, digitisation, shop automation, supply chain, portability, grievance redress, cash-transfer pilots
  2. Assess how far they have made the system effective, and the gaps that remain

Open with · The TPDS, which delivers the grain entitlement under the National Food Security Act, has been reformed through law, technology and delivery changes to cut leakage and exclusion.

Cover

  • Legal right: the National Food Security Act, 2013 covers up to 75% of rural and 50% of urban people, making subsidised grain an entitlement.
  • Digitisation: ration cards and beneficiary lists are computerised and seeded with Aadhaar, weeding out duplicate and bogus cards; distribution is tracked on the Annavitran portal.
  • Shop automation: electronic point-of-sale devices with Aadhaar authentication help ensure the right beneficiary gets the right quantity, cutting diversion at the shop.
  • Supply chain: GPS tracking of grain trucks, SMS alerts, doorstep delivery to fair price shops and modern silos for storage reduce leakage and losses.
  • Portability: Integrated Management of PDS (IM-PDS) and One Nation One Ration Card let migrants draw their grain at any fair price shop.
  • Transparency and grievances: the Act provides State Food Commissions, district grievance officers, social audits and vigilance committees; toll-free helplines and portals add access.
  • DBT pilots: cash transfer of food subsidy began in Chandigarh, Puducherry and part of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, letting households buy grain in the market.

Close with · The reforms have improved targeting and transparency; Aadhaar and connectivity failures, storage losses and grievance gaps still need fixing so that no eligible household is left out.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2019, GS Paper III — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 283 words (UPSC limit 250) · Minimalist IAS

The Targeted Public Distribution System delivers the grain entitlement of the National Food Security Act, 2013 to up to 75 per cent of rural and 50 per cent of urban India: 5 kg per person a month for priority households and 35 kg per Antyodaya household. Reforms have attacked leakage, bogus cards and exclusion through law, technology and delivery changes.

Reformative steps

  • Legal entitlement: the NFSA made subsidised grain a right, initially at Rs 3, 2 and 1 per kg for rice, wheat and coarse grains.
  • Digitisation: computerised ration cards and beneficiary lists, seeded with Aadhaar, removed duplicate and bogus cards; the Annavitran portal tracks distribution.
  • Shop automation: electronic point-of-sale devices with Aadhaar authentication ensure the right beneficiary gets the right quantity.
  • Supply chain: GPS-tracked trucks, SMS alerts to cardholders, doorstep delivery to fair price shops and modern silos cut diversion and losses.
  • Portability: Integrated Management of PDS and One Nation One Ration Card let migrants draw grain at any shop.
  • Accountability: State Food Commissions, district grievance officers, social audits, vigilance committees, toll-free helplines and transparency portals.
  • Cash transfer pilots: direct transfer of the food subsidy in Chandigarh and Puducherry (September 2015) and part of Dadra and Nagar Haveli (March 2016).

How far effective

  • Gains: bogus cards weeded out, diversion at shops reduced, migrants covered and grievance channels created.
  • Gaps: Aadhaar authentication and connectivity failures can shut out the genuinely poor; storage and transit losses continue; State Food Commissions are weak; coverage caps still rest on the 2011 Census.

The reforms have made distribution more targeted and transparent; the next step is to fix exclusion at the point of sale, storage losses and grievance redress so that no eligible household is left out.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Farm subsidies, MSP, PDS & food security →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this