Minimalist IAS
2019 GS Paper I

UPSC CSE (Main) 2019 · GS Paper I · Question 20

Are we losing our local identity for the global identity ? Discuss.

Syllabus line: Globalisation & Indian society — “Effects of globalization on Indian society.”

GS Paper I 2019 · Q20

15 marks · 250 words Globalisation & Indian society

Are we losing our local identity for the global identity ? Discuss.

Approach · directive: “discuss”

What it asks · Weigh the evidence that globalisation dilutes local languages, food, dress and communities against the evidence of adaptation and revival, and reach a balanced view.

The question has 3 parts — answer each

  1. Discuss the evidence that local identity is being lost to a global identity
  2. Discuss the counter-evidence: adaptation, revival and layered identities
  3. Reach a balanced verdict with a way forward

Open with · Globalisation carries a common consumer culture, English and global media into every town; whether this replaces or only enlarges local identity is the debate.

Cover

  • Signs of loss: English and global brands dominate, and many mother tongues, dialects and tribal languages are losing speakers.
  • Homogenisation: fast food, fashion, commercialised festivals and youth culture shaped by global streaming and social media narrow the range of local tastes and practices.
  • Economic pressure: mass-produced goods displace crafts, handloom and local cuisine, and migration to cities weakens village institutions and the patronage of folk arts.
  • Adaptation: local culture also goes global; yoga (International Day of Yoga, 2015), Indian cuisine, cinema and music travel abroad, and digital platforms widen regional audiences.
  • Protection: GI tags under the 1999 Act, UNESCO intangible heritage listings (Yoga, Kumbh Mela, Durga Puja) and mother-tongue instruction under NEP 2020 support local identity.
  • Layered identities: Indians hold local, regional, national and global identities together; a cosmopolitan outlook is compatible with rootedness if local roots are valued.
  • Way forward: multilingual education, documentation of endangered languages and arts, support for artisans and fair-trade markets, so that globalisation becomes exchange, not replacement.

Close with · Global exposure is changing local identity, not erasing it; conscious support for language, craft and community life will keep the exchange two-way.

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2019, GS Paper I — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 285 words (UPSC limit 250) · Minimalist IAS

Globalisation carries a common consumer culture, English and global media into every Indian town; whether this replaces local identity or merely adds a layer to it is the question.

Signs of loss

  • Language: English and global brands dominate work, media and aspiration, and many mother tongues, dialects and tribal languages are losing speakers.
  • Homogenised taste: fast food, global fashion, commercialised festivals and a youth culture shaped by streaming and social media narrow the range of local practices.
  • Economic displacement: mass-produced goods push out crafts, handloom and local cuisine, and migration to cities weakens village institutions and the patronage of folk arts.

Signs of adaptation and revival

  • Local goes global: yoga (International Day of Yoga, 2015), Indian cuisine, cinema and music travel abroad, and digital platforms give regional languages and music larger audiences than before.
  • Protection: GI tags under the 1999 Act, UNESCO intangible heritage listings (Yoga, Kumbh Mela, Durga Puja) and mother-tongue instruction under NEP 2020 support local identity.
  • Layered identities: Indians hold local, regional, national and global identities together; a cosmopolitan outlook coexists with rootedness when local roots are valued.
  • Two-way exchange: global brands adapt to local taste and global platforms carry local content, so the traffic is not one-way.

Verdict and way forward

  • Global exposure is changing local identity, not erasing it, but the change is uneven: what has market value or state support survives, while dialects and crafts without patrons fade.
  • Multilingual education, documentation of endangered languages and arts, support for artisans and fair-trade markets, and community festivals can keep the exchange two-way.

We are not losing local identity so much as renegotiating it; conscious support for language, craft and community life will ensure that globalisation enlarges identity rather than flattening it.

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Globalisation & Indian society →