Minimalist IAS
2017 GS Paper III

UPSC CSE (Main) 2017 · GS Paper III · Question 7

India has achieved remarkable successes in unmanned space missions including the Chandrayaan and Mars…

Syllabus line: IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR — “Awareness in the fields of IT, Space, Computers, robotics, nano-technology, bio-technology and issues relating to intellectual property rights.”

GS Paper III 2017 · Q7

10 marks · 150 words IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR

India has achieved remarkable successes in unmanned space missions including the Chandrayaan and Mars Orbitter Mission, but has not ventured into manned space missions. What are the main obstacles to launching a manned space mission, both in terms of technology and logistics ? Examine critically.

Approach · directive: “what are the main obstacles / examine critically”

What it asks · Identify the technological and logistical hurdles to India's first human spaceflight, and weigh them against the case for going ahead.

The question has 2 parts — answer each

  1. What are the main obstacles to a manned space mission, in technology and in logistics
  2. Examine critically: weigh the obstacles against the case for going ahead

Open with · Sending a person to orbit and back is a different order of challenge from sending a probe: the payload must survive, and so must the crew.

Cover

  • Launch vehicle: a human-rated rocket with near-zero failure tolerance is needed; the GSLV Mk III class must be certified and proven through repeated flights.
  • Crew module and return: heat shield, safe re-entry, parachute deceleration and sea recovery; India tested re-entry with the CARE capsule in 2014.
  • Life support and safety: air, water, temperature and radiation control, plus a crew escape system for launch aborts.
  • Logistics: astronaut selection, medical and training facilities, mission control, tracking network, and recovery ships and aircraft.
  • Cost and priorities: heavy, long-term spending against other development needs; a small setback can cost lives and prestige.
  • Critical view: the barrier is more about certification, reliability and funding than raw capability; ISRO's launch and re-entry experience is a base.
  • Case for it: spin-offs in materials, medicine and electronics, national prestige, inspiration for youth and space diplomacy; international cooperation can fill gaps.

Close with · The obstacles are demanding but manageable; a phased, safety-first programme with partnerships can take India from robotic to human space exploration.

Add value (verified)

  • ISRO's Gaganyaan project (after 2017) aims to fly a crew of three to a 400 km orbit for three days and bring them back to a landing in Indian waters. Gaganyaan — ISRO ↗“Gaganyaan project envisages demonstration of human spaceflight capability by launching crew of 3 members to an orbit of 400 km for a 3 days mission and bring them back safely to earth, by landing in Indian sea waters.”

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2017, GS Paper III — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer · 228 words (UPSC limit 150) · Minimalist IAS

A crewed flight is a different order of challenge from a probe: the payload must survive, and so must the crew.

Technological obstacles

  • Human-rated launcher: a rocket certified for near-zero failure tolerance; GSLV Mk III, whose first developmental flight was in June 2017, must prove itself over repeated launches.
  • Crew module and return: heat shield, controlled re-entry, parachute deceleration and sea recovery; ISRO tested these with SRE-1 (2007) and the CARE capsule (2014).
  • Life support: air, water, temperature and radiation control in a sealed cabin, and a crew escape system for launch aborts, neither flight-tested by 2017.

Logistical obstacles

  • Astronaut selection and training, space medicine, crewed mission control, a global tracking network and recovery ships.
  • Cost: a decade-long budget commitment competes with development needs, and one failure costs lives and prestige.

Critical examination

  • The barrier is certification, reliability and funding, not raw capability: ISRO has a heavy launcher, re-entry experience and deep-space navigation from Chandrayaan-1 and the Mars Orbiter Mission.
  • The case for going ahead: spin-offs in materials, medicine and electronics, prestige, inspiration for youth and space diplomacy; partnerships can fill gaps in training and life support.

The obstacles are demanding but manageable; a phased, safety-first programme with partnerships can take India from robotic to human spaceflight (since then, ISRO's Gaganyaan programme envisages a three-member crew in a 400 km orbit for three days, returning to Indian waters).

Written by Minimalist IAS from facts checked at source (how we verify) — a little fuller than exam length, so every part of the question is covered; in the hall, keep the structure and trim the detail. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on IT, space, robotics, biotech & IPR →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this