Minimalist IAS
Sign upसाइन अप
2016 GS Paper II

UPSC CSE (Main) 2016 · GS Paper II · Question 18

Evaluate the economic and strategic dimensions of India’s Look East Policy in the context of the post Cold…

UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2016, General Studies Paper II (GS 2), Question 18 — 12.5 marks, 200 words.

Syllabus line: Groupings & agreements — “Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.”

GS Paper II 2016 · Q18

12½ marks · 200 words Groupings & agreements

Evaluate the economic and strategic dimensions of India’s Look East Policy in the context of the post Cold War international scenario.

Approach · directive: “evaluate”

What it asks · Assess how the Look East Policy served India's economic and strategic interests in the post-Cold War world, with its gains and limits.

It asks 3 things — answer each

  1. Evaluate the economic dimension of the Look East Policy: gains and limits
  2. Evaluate the strategic dimension in the post-Cold War scenario: gains and limits
  3. Give a reasoned verdict and the way forward

Open with · The Cold War's end and the 1991 liberalisation turned India towards Southeast and East Asia through the Look East Policy of the early 1990s.

Cover

  • Institutional ladder: Sectoral Dialogue Partner (1992), Dialogue Partner (1995), summit level (2002), East Asia Summit (2005) and Strategic Partnership (2012).
  • Economic gains: the 2003 framework agreement led to the goods FTA (AITIGA, signed 2009, in force January 2010) and a services agreement (2014).
  • Connectivity: the Kaladan project and the Trilateral Highway aim to turn the landlocked Northeast into a gateway to ASEAN.
  • Strategic gains: balancing China's rise, joining ASEAN-led defence and maritime forums (ADMM+, Expanded ASEAN Maritime Forum).
  • Limits: a trade deficit with ASEAN, slow connectivity projects and China's larger weight; upgraded to Act East in 2014.
  • Way forward: review AITIGA, speed up corridors, and make the Northeast the hinge of Act East.

Close with · Since then, a decade of Act East (2024) has shown that delivery on connectivity corridors and balanced trade decides whether India's presence in Asia becomes leverage.

Add value (verified)

Question: UPSC's CS (Main) 2016, GS Paper II — paper ↗. Approach: Minimalist IAS, checked 3 Oct 2026 (how we verify) — UPSC publishes no model answers. ·

Model answer· 303words · Minimalist IAS

The Cold War's end removed India's Soviet anchor just as the 1991 crisis forced liberalisation. The Look East Policy of the early 1990s answered both, turning India towards the fast-growing economies and security order of Southeast and East Asia.

1992SectoralDialoguePartner1995DialoguePartner2002Summit-levelties2010ASEAN goods FTAin force2014Act East
  1. 1992: Sectoral Dialogue Partner
  2. 1995: Dialogue Partner
  3. 2002: Summit-level ties
  4. 2010: ASEAN goods FTA in force
  5. 2014: Act East

Economic dimension

  • Trade architecture: the 2003 framework agreement led to the goods agreement (AITIGA), signed in 2009 and in force from January 2010, and a services agreement (2014).
  • Connectivity: the Kaladan multi-modal project and the India–Myanmar–Thailand Trilateral Highway aim to make the landlocked Northeast a gateway.
  • Limits: a widening trade deficit with ASEAN, slow projects, and late opening in services, where India is strongest.

Strategic dimension in the post-Cold War order

  • Balancing China: ties with ASEAN and Japan gave India weight as China's influence grew.
  • Maritime security: joining the ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting-Plus and the Expanded ASEAN Maritime Forum to build security ties at sea.
  • Seat at the table: the ASEAN Regional Forum, the East Asia Summit (2005), and a Strategic Partnership with ASEAN at the 2012 Commemorative Summit.
  • Northeast: treating the region as a bridge to Myanmar linked internal security to foreign policy.
  • Limits: China's economic weight in ASEAN far exceeds India's; instability in Myanmar slows projects.

Verdict and way forward

  • Verdict: a lasting presence was built, but 'looking' outpaced 'acting', hence the 2014 upgrade to Act East.
  • Next steps: review AITIGA to ease the deficit (since then, the main agenda of India-ASEAN economic ministers' meetings), finish the Kaladan and Trilateral Highway corridors, and develop the Northeast as Act East's hinge.

The policy made India a stakeholder in the Asia-Pacific order. Since then, a decade of Act East (2024) has confirmed that delivery on corridors and balanced trade, not summit declarations, judges the policy.

Prepared by Minimalist IAS to the answer standard of Shivam Singh (mentor, 7 years) · facts checked against official sources (how we verify) · updated 3 Oct 2026. UPSC publishes no model answers: compare your structure and coverage with this, then write your own.

Cite this question: UPSC CSE Mains GS-2 2016, Q18 — minimalistias.com/pyqs/mains/2016/gs2/q18 Discuss on WhatsApp

Write it now · 7 minutes for 200 words, by hand, as in the exam 07:00
Free · 3 answers on us Write this answer — get it evaluated free Handwrite it in 200 words, scan it into one PDF, and get a score and remarks from a mentor within 72 hours. Write it

Also asked on this syllabus line

All questions on Groupings & agreements →

Build the base: Prelims PYQs on this

Free · Daily Updates Join Minimalist IAS on Telegram or WhatsApp A PYQ every morning, the Daily Brief and the Sunday quiz. Free, no sign-up. Join Telegram Join on WhatsApp →