On the basis of the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Food safety is a complex issue that calls for a multipronged solution.
- 2.Great investments need to be made in developing the manpower for surveillance and training.
- 3.India needs to make sufficient legislation for governing food processing industry.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only
The passage lists many sources of contamination and calls for regulation, public awareness, multi-agency surveillance, trained inspectors and educated street vendors — a many-sided answer to a complex problem, resting on trained people. It says nothing about new laws for the food processing industry.
- ✓ 1. 'Myriad factors that need regulation and monitoring', public awareness, several agencies and vendor training — a multipronged approach.
- ✓ 2. Surveillance 'entails a good training of inspection staff', and investing in training street vendors is 'of great significance'.
- ✗ 3. Neither the food processing industry nor legislation is discussed; the focus is farm chemicals, hygiene, street food and surveillance.
Remember · A valid assumption reflects the passage's own remedies; a new sector or instrument it never mentions is outside it.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2019, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·