Which of the following is the most crucial inference from the above passage?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) The growth driven by GDP only is neither desirable nor sustainable.
World GDP grew by 50 per cent while inclusive wealth grew by only 6 per cent, and natural capital actually fell by 30 per cent. GDP-driven growth is eating into the wealth it rests on, so growth driven by GDP alone is neither desirable nor sustainable.
- ✗ (a) Natural capital is only one part of the story; the passage's criticism is of GDP-driven growth as a whole, which also held back human capital.
- ✓ (b) GDP rose sharply while inclusive wealth barely moved and natural capital shrank — growth measured by GDP alone harms human and natural capital, so it can neither last nor be welcomed.
- ✗ (c) The passage does not judge the countries' economic performance in general — GDP in fact grew by 50 per cent. It questions the kind of growth.
- ✗ (d) Human capital grew slowly, but the passage does not argue that the world needs more of it; its target is GDP-only growth.
Remember · For the 'most crucial inference', prefer the option that captures the whole contrast (here GDP versus inclusive wealth), not one fragment of the data.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2017, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·