With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Relying on foreign investment in the long run is not an economically sound policy.
- 2.Policies must be undertaken to reduce volatility in foreign private investment.
- 3.Policies must be undertaken to strengthen domestic private investment.
- 4.Public investment should be given priority over private investment.
- 5.Substantial public investment in education and health should be undertaken.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 1, 3 and 5
Because FDI is volatile by nature and its technology gains depend on India's own physical and human capital, the passage implies: do not lean on foreign investment in the long run (1), build up domestic investment to carry employment (3), and invest in education and health so that technology can spread (5).
- ✓ 1. Employment 'cannot be left to' FDI, its volatility brings unstable jobs and wider inequalities, and even its technology benefit is 'not at all certain'.
- ✗ 2. The passage calls volatility 'a necessary consequence' of FDI's search for the highest returns — something built in, not something policy is expected to remove.
- ✓ 3. If employment cannot be entrusted to the more volatile foreign capital, the author must be counting on domestic investment to carry it.
- ✗ 4. The passage never ranks public against private investment; it contrasts foreign with domestic.
- ✓ 5. Technology diffusion may fail because India's 'physical and human capital' is inadequate; building human capital means investing in education and health.
Remember · In multi-statement items, settle the surest statements first; often only one option contains all of them.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2020, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·