On the basis of the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
- 1.Governments and companies need to be adequately prepared to face the climate change.
- 2.Extreme weather events will reduce the economic growth of governments and companies in future.
- 3.Ignoring climate change is a huge risk for investors.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
Climate change, and government action on it, can hit investors' returns through taxes, regulation, stranded assets and weather damage. So governments and companies must prepare, and ignoring climate change is a large risk for investors. The passage says industries 'could be affected', not that growth will fall.
- ✓ 1. Higher taxes, regulatory burdens and stranded assets await unprepared companies, and governments are expected to act 'however reluctant'.
- ✗ 2. 'Could be affected' is a possibility; 'will reduce' makes it certain, and the 'economic growth of governments' is not discussed.
- ✓ 3. Climate change 'could have a big impact on investors' returns' — ignoring it is a big risk.
Remember · Match the level of certainty: 'could' in the passage does not support 'will' in a statement.
Question and answer: UPSC's official GS Paper II (2019, Series A) — paper ↗ · answer key ↗. Explanation: Minimalist IAS, checked 30 Sept 2026 (how we verify). ·